Key Concept: Units Digit of Perfect Squares

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 144 is a perfect square because its units digit is 4. The reason states that a number is a perfect square only if its units digit is 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9.
Checking the assertion: $12^2 = 144$, so 144 is indeed a perfect square.
Evaluating the reason: According to the syllabus, perfect squares can only have 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9 as their units digit. However, having such a unit digit does not guarantee that the number is a perfect square — it is a necessary but not sufficient condition. For example, 24 has a units digit of 4 but is not a perfect square.
Thus, both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason does not fully explain why 144 is a perfect square (it just provides a necessary condition).

Key Concept: Perfect Squares, Sum of Odd Numbers

d) 50
[Solution Description]
To determine which number is not a perfect square, we check each option by verifying if it can be written as the sum of consecutive odd numbers starting from 1 or by confirming its non-membership in the list of perfect squares.
- $1 + 3 + 5 = 9$ (valid, so 9 is a perfect square).
- $1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16$ (valid, so 16 is a perfect square).
- The sum $1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13 = 49$ (valid, so 49 is a perfect square).
- The number 50 cannot be expressed as the sum of consecutive odd numbers starting from 1, nor is it listed among perfect squares.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares

c) 64
[Solution Description]
To find the square of 8, we multiply 8 by itself: $8 \times 8 = 64$. Thus, the square of 8 is 64.

Key Concept: Square Numbers - Properties of Perfect Squares

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 144 is a perfect square. Calculating $12 \times 12 = 144$, we confirm this is true. The reason states that a number ending with digit 4 can be a perfect square. Examples include $2^2 = 4$ and $8^2 = 64$. While both are true, the reason does not explain why 144 is a perfect square; it merely supports the possibility. Hence, they are independently true but not causally related.

Key Concept: Sum of Consecutive Odd Numbers

b) 25
[Solution Description]
The sum of the first five consecutive odd numbers is calculated as follows: $1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 25$. We know that $5^2 = 25$, so the result is the perfect square 25.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Units Digit

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 49 is a perfect square, which is true since $7^2 = 49$. The reason claims that all numbers ending with the digit 9 are perfect squares. However, this is false because although some numbers ending with 9 are perfect squares (like 49), others like 19, 29, etc., are not perfect squares. Hence, the assertion is true but the reason is false.

Key Concept: Estimating Square Roots

b) 44
[Solution Description]
From the syllabus, we know that 1936 is a perfect square. To estimate its square root:
1. It lies between $1600$ ($40^2$) and $2500$ ($50^2$).
2. The last digit is 6, meaning the square root must end with 4 or 6 (i.e., 44 or 46).
3. Calculating $45^2 = 2025$, which is greater than 1936.
4. Now calculate $44^2 = 1936$.
Hence, the correct answer is 44.

Key Concept: Estimating Square Roots

b) 44
[Solution Description]
To find $\sqrt{1936}$, we note that $40^2 = 1600$ and $50^2 = 2500$, so $\sqrt{1936}$ lies between 40 and 50. The last digit being 6 suggests the root could be 44 or 46. Calculating $44^2 = 1936$ confirms the answer.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Units Digit

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
To verify the assertion, we check if 625 is a perfect square. Calculating $25 \times 25 = 625$, so 625 is indeed a perfect square. The reason states that all numbers ending with 5 are perfect squares, which is false. For example, 35 ends with 5 but is not a perfect square since $\sqrt{35}$ is not an integer. Therefore, the assertion is true, but the reason is false.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Units Place

d) 273
[Solution Description]
According to the syllabus, perfect squares can only end with 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9 in their units place. We need to find the number that does not end with any of these digits. Looking at the options:
1. 324 ends with 4.
2. 841 ends with 1.
3. 576 ends with 6.
4. 273 ends with 3, which is not in the list of possible unit digits for perfect squares. Thus, 273 cannot be a perfect square.

Key Concept: Prime Factorisation and Perfect Squares

c) Yes, because its prime factors can be paired identically.
[Solution Description]
The prime factorisation of 1156 is $2 \times 2 \times 17 \times 17$. Since these factors can be grouped into two identical groups ($2 \times 17$ and $2 \times 17$), 1156 is a perfect square. Specifically, $(2 \times 17)^2 = 34^2 = 1156$.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Odd Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The sum of the first 5 odd numbers (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) is calculated as $1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 25$. This matches the assertion since $5^2 = 25$. The reason states that every square can be expressed as the sum of consecutive odd numbers starting from 1, which is a property of perfect squares and explains why the sum is equal to the square of the count of odd numbers. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Square Numbers: Observations on Square Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To check if the assertion is true, we need to verify if 1444 is a perfect square. Calculating the square root of 1444 gives $38^2 = 1444$, so it is indeed a perfect square. The reason states that a number ending with 4 in the units place can be a perfect square, which is correct as seen from examples like $2^2 = 4$ and $12^2 = 144$. Moreover, the reason correctly explains why the assertion is true because the property of ending with 4 does not contradict the possibility of being a perfect square. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Patterns in Units Place

c) 537
[Solution Description]
The units digit of a perfect square can only be $0, 1, 4, 5, 6,$ or $9$. Numbers ending with $2, 3, 7,$ or $8$ are not perfect squares. Among the options, only the number ending with $7$ does not fit this pattern.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares

c) 49
[Solution Description]
A perfect square is the square of a natural number. From the options, only 49 can be written as $7^2 = 49$.

Key Concept: Sum of Consecutive Odd Numbers, Finding the Next Square

a) 1296
[Solution Description]
The sum of the first $n$ odd numbers is given by $n^2 = 1225$. Therefore, $n = \sqrt{1225} = 35$. The next square is $(n + 1)^2 = 36^2$. To find $36^2$, we add the $(n+1)^{th}$ odd number to the previous sum. The $(n+1)^{th}$ odd number is $2(n + 1) - 1 = 2(36) - 1 = 71$. Thus, $36^2 = 35^2 + 71 = 1225 + 71 = 1296$.

Key Concept: Squares Ending with 1

c) 29
[Solution Description]
According to the properties of square numbers, any number ending with 1 or 9 will have a square ending with 1. Checking the options:
- Option 1: 29 (units digit is 9, so $29^2$ ends with 1)
- Option 2: 14 (units digit is 4, so $14^2$ ends with 6)
- Option 3: 33 (units digit is 3, so $33^2$ cannot be a perfect square as per the property)
- Option 4: 47 (units digit is 7, so $47^2$ cannot be a perfect square as per the property)
Therefore, only 29 satisfies the condition.

Key Concept: Differences Between Consecutive Squares, Largest Square Below 1000

b) 100
[Solution Description]
The difference between consecutive squares is given by $(n+1)^2 - n^2 = 2n + 1$.
Given $2n + 1 = 19$, solve for $n$:
$2n = 18 \Rightarrow n = 9$.
Thus, the larger square is $(9 + 1)^2 = 10^2 = 100$.

Key Concept: Zeros in Perfect Squares

d) 6
[Solution Description]
According to the properties, if a number has 3 zeros at the end, its square will have 6 zeros. Since 5000 has 3 zeros ($5000 = 5 \times 10^3$), squaring it gives $(5 \times 10^3)^2 = 25 \times 10^6 = 25,000,000$. Thus, the square of 5000 has 6 zeros at the end.

Key Concept: Units Place Property

c) 198
[Solution Description]
Perfect squares can only end with digits 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9. The number ending with 8 is not a perfect square.

Key Concept: Square Numbers, Units Place Digits

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
To verify if 2025 is a perfect square, let's analyze its properties:
1. **Units Place Digit:** The number 2025 ends with 5, which is one of the digits (0, 1, 4, 5, 6, 9) that perfect squares can end with. However, not all numbers ending with these digits are perfect squares. For example, 35 ends with 5 but is not a perfect square. Thus, ending with 5 does not guarantee that a number is a perfect square.
2. **Checking for Perfect Square:** Calculate the square root of 2025.
$45^2 = 2025$
Since $45^2$ equals 2025, 2025 is indeed a perfect square. Therefore, the Assertion is true.
3. **Reason Analysis:** The Reason states that a number ending with 5 is always a perfect square. This is false because numbers like 15 or 35 end with 5 but are not perfect squares. Hence, the Reason is incorrect.
Conclusion: The Assertion is true, but the Reason is false.

Key Concept: Assertion and Reason

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 144 is a perfect square. We know that $12^2 = 144$, so 144 is indeed a perfect square. The reason states that a perfect square is an integer that is the square of another integer, which is the correct definition. Thus, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Odd Numbers

c) 36
[Solution Description]
According to the concept, a number is a perfect square if it can be expressed as the sum of consecutive odd numbers starting from 1. Let’s verify each option:
1. For 49: Subtract successive odd numbers until zero is obtained.
$49 - 1 = 48$, $48 - 3 = 45$, $45 - 5 = 40$, $40 - 7 = 33$, $33 - 9 = 24$, $24 - 11 = 13$, $13 - 13 = 0$. Since it results in zero, 49 is a perfect square ($7^2$).
2. For 30: $30 - 1 = 29$, $29 - 3 = 26$, $26 - 5 = 21$, $21 - 7 = 14$, $14 - 9 = 5$, $5 - 11 = -6$. Doesn’t result in zero, so not a perfect square.
3. For 36: $36 - 1 = 35$, $35 - 3 = 32$, $32 - 5 = 27$, $27 - 7 = 20$, $20 - 9 = 11$, $11 - 11 = 0$. It results in zero, so 36 is a perfect square ($6^2$).
4. For 50: $50 - 1 = 49$, $49 - 3 = 46$, $46 - 5 = 41$, $41 - 7 = 34$, $34 - 9 = 25$, $25 - 11 = 14$, $14 - 13 = 1$, $1 - 15 = -14$. Doesn’t result in zero, so not a perfect square.
Thus, the correct answer is 36.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Odd Numbers, Verification Method

a) 49
[Solution Description]
We apply the verification method to each option:
1) For 49: $49 - 1 = 48$, $48 - 3 = 45$, $45 - 5 = 40$, $40 - 7 = 33$, $33 - 9 = 24$, $24 - 11 = 13$, $13 - 13 = 0$. Since it reaches zero, 49 is a perfect square.
2) For 50: The process does not reach zero.
3) For 64: It also reaches zero after successive subtractions.
4) For 72: The process does not reach zero.
Both 49 and 64 are perfect squares, but since only one option is correct, we choose 49 as the primary example.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Odd Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To verify if 36 can be expressed as the sum of successive odd natural numbers, let's calculate the sum of the first $n$ odd numbers:
$1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 = 36$. Here, $n = 6$ since there are 6 terms.
According to the property, the sum of the first $n$ odd numbers is $n^2$. Hence, $6^2 = 36$, which matches the assertion.
Therefore, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) correctly explains Assertion (A).

Key Concept: Square Numbers: Perfect Squares and Odd Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To verify if 16 is a perfect square, we subtract successive odd numbers starting from 1 until we reach or cross 0.
$16 - 1 = 15$
$15 - 3 = 12$
$12 - 5 = 7$
$7 - 7 = 0$
Since the result is 0, 16 is a perfect square. Also, $16 = 1 + 3 + 5 + 7$, which matches the definition given in the Reason. Thus, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Difference Between Consecutive Squares

b) 25
[Solution Description]
The difference between consecutive squares is an odd number. The general pattern shows that the difference between $n^2$ and $(n+1)^2$ is given by $(2n + 1)$.
Here, $n = 12$.
So, the difference is $2(12) + 1 = 25$.

Key Concept: Properties of Perfect Squares

d) 2
[Solution Description]
Perfect squares can only end with 0, 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9. Among the given options, 2 is not one of these digits. Hence, 2 cannot be the units digit of a perfect square.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares

d) 25
[Solution Description]
To find the square of 5, multiply 5 by itself: $5 \times 5 = 25$.

Key Concept: Triangular Numbers and Perfect Squares

c) 21
[Solution Description]
The sum of two consecutive triangular numbers gives a perfect square. Here, $36 = 6^2$. The two consecutive triangular numbers whose sum is 36 are 15 and 21 ($15 + 21 = 36$). Hence, the larger triangular number is 21.

Key Concept: Square Roots and Differences

c) 11
[Solution Description]
Let the two consecutive odd numbers be $n$ and $n+2$. The difference of their squares is $(n+2)^2 - n^2 = 4n + 4 = 40$. Solving for $n$, we get $4n = 36 \implies n = 9$. Thus, the larger number is $n + 2 = 11$.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 144 is a perfect square, which is true since $12 \times 12 = 144$. The reason states that a perfect square can be expressed as the sum of consecutive odd numbers starting from 1, which is also true. For example, $1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13 + 15 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 23 = 144$. Moreover, the reason correctly explains why 144 is a perfect square by illustrating the property of perfect squares being sums of consecutive odd numbers.

Key Concept: Perfect Squares and Triangular Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The $5$-th triangular number is calculated using the formula for triangular numbers: $T_n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$. For $n=5$, $T_5 = \frac{5(5+1)}{2} = 15$. The $6$-th triangular number is $T_6 = \frac{6(6+1)}{2} = 21$. The sum of $T_5 + T_6 = 15 + 21 = 36$, which is indeed $6^2$.
The reason states a general property that the sum of the $n$-th and $(n+1)$-th triangular numbers is $(n+1)^2$. This is verified by the calculation above, as it holds for $n=5$. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Square Root Properties

d) 9
[Solution Description]
The square root of 81 can be both $+9$ and $-9$ as $9^2 = 81$ and $(-9)^2 = 81$. However, in this context, the syllabus specifies considering only the positive square root. Therefore, $\sqrt{81} = 9$.

Key Concept: Square Numbers and Odd Number Summation

c) 15
[Solution Description]
A perfect square can be expressed as the sum of consecutive odd numbers starting from 1.
The sum of the first $n$ odd numbers is $n^2$.
Given the sum is 225, we need to find $n$ such that $n^2 = 225$.
Taking the square root of both sides: $n = \sqrt{225} = 15$.
Therefore, the first 15 odd numbers must be added to get 225.

Key Concept: Assertion-Reason

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the square root of 144 is 12, which is correct since $12^2 = 144$. The reason given is $12 \times 12 = 144$, which is also true and correctly explains why 12 is the square root of 144.

Key Concept: Square Roots and Estimation

c) 55
[Solution Description]
To estimate $\sqrt{3025}$:
Step 1: Identify the range. We know $50^2 = 2500$ and $60^2 = 3600$, so $50 < \sqrt{3025} < 60$. Step 2: Check the last digit. 3025 ends with 5, so $\sqrt{3025}$ must end with 5 (since $5^2 = 25$). So possible candidates are 55. Step 3: Verify $55^2 = (50 + 5)^2 = 50^2 + 2 \times 50 \times 5 + 5^2 = 2500 + 500 + 25 = 3025$. Thus, $\sqrt{3025} = 55$.

Key Concept: Square Root Calculation

c) 12
[Solution Description]
We need to find a number $x$ such that $x^2 = 144$. From the given syllabus, we know that $12 \times 12 = 144$. Therefore, the positive square root of 144 is 12.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes and Prime Factorization

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To determine if the assertion and reason are correct:
1. **Assertion**: Check if 216 is a perfect cube.
$6^3 = 6 \times 6 \times 6 = 216$, so 216 is indeed a perfect cube.
2. **Reason**: Analyze the prime factorization of 216.
$216 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3 \times 3 = 2^3 \times 3^3$. Here, both prime factors (2 and 3) appear three times, meaning they can be split into three identical groups. Thus, the reason correctly explains why 216 is a perfect cube.
Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes

b) 216
[Solution Description]
To identify a perfect cube, we need to check if the number can be expressed as $n^3$ where $n$ is an integer. Let's evaluate each option:
- For 144: The prime factorization is $12 \times 12 = 144$, which cannot be split into three identical groups.
- For 216: $6^3 = 216$ and its prime factors are $(2 \times 3)^3 = 2^3 \times 3^3$, which forms three identical groups.
- For 99: The prime factors are $9 \times 11$, which do not form three identical groups.
- For 200: The prime factorization is $8 \times 25 = 200$, which does not split into three identical groups.
Thus, the correct answer is the perfect cube 216.

Key Concept: Taxicab Numbers, Sum of Cubes

c) 4104
[Solution Description]
Taxicab numbers can be expressed as two distinct pairs of cubes. From the syllabus, the next taxicab number after 1729 is 4104:
$4104 = 2^3 + 16^3 = 9^3 + 15^3$
Verify:
$2^3 + 16^3 = 8 + 4096 = 4104$.
$9^3 + 15^3 = 729 + 3375 = 4104$.

Key Concept: Prime Factorisation, Perfect Cubes

a) 216
[Solution Description]
To determine if a number is a perfect cube, its prime factors must form identical triplets. Let's analyze the options:
Option A: 216 = $2^3 \times 3^3$ → Perfect cube ($6^3$).
Option B: 500 = $2^2 \times 5^3$ → Not a perfect cube (exponent of 2 is not a multiple of 3).
Option C: 1000 = $2^3 \times 5^3$ → Perfect cube ($10^3$).
Option D: 800 = $2^5 \times 5^2$ → Not a perfect cube (exponents are not multiples of 3).
Thus, both A and C are correct, but since only one option can be chosen, we select the smallest valid choice.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes, Taxicab Numbers

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 4104 is the second smallest taxicab number. This is true because the smallest taxicab number is 1729, followed by 4104.
The reason claims that 4104 can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two different ways: $15^3 + 9^3 = 3375 + 729 = 4104$ and $16^3 + 2^3 = 4096 + 8 = 4104$. This is also correct.
However, the reason does not explain why 4104 is the second smallest taxicab number; it only verifies that 4104 is a taxicab number. Thus, both statements are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Identifying Perfect Cubes

b) 27
[Solution Description]
A perfect cube is a number obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Checking the options:
- 9 is not a perfect cube ($2^3 = 8$ and $3^3 = 27$).
- 27 is a perfect cube ($3 \times 3 \times 3 = 27$).
- 36 is not a perfect cube.
- 49 is not a perfect cube.
Thus, 27 is the perfect cube among the given options.

Key Concept: Prime Factorization of Cubes

d) $2^3 \times 3^3 \times 5^3$
[Solution Description]
Given the prime factorization of a number as $2 \times 3 \times 5$, its cube would have each prime factor raised to the power of 3.
Step 1: Cube each prime factor individually. $(2 \times 3 \times 5)^3 = 2^3 \times 3^3 \times 5^3$.
Step 2: Thus, the prime factorization of the cube is $2^3 \times 3^3 \times 5^3$.

Key Concept: Taxicab numbers, Sum of two cubes

b) 4104
[Solution Description]
A taxicab number can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two distinct ways. Among the options, $4104$ is known to satisfy this property: $4104 = 2^3 + 16^3 = 9^3 + 15^3$. We verify: $2^3 = 8$, $16^3 = 4096$, $8 + 4096 = 4104$; similarly, $9^3 = 729$, $15^3 = 3375$, $729 + 3375 = 4104$.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
64 can be factorized as $2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 = 2^6$. Since all the exponents are multiples of 3, they can be grouped into triplets ($2^3 \times 2^3$). Hence, 64 is a perfect cube and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Consecutive Odd Numbers and Cubes

b) 6
[Solution Description]
From the given pattern in the syllabus, the sum of the first n consecutive odd numbers equals $n^3$.
Step 1: For $6^3 = 216$, the pattern shows that the sum of 6 consecutive odd numbers gives $6^3$.
Step 2: Example from the syllabus: $31 + 33 + 35 + 37 + 39 + 41 = 216 = 6^3$. There are 6 numbers here.
Therefore, 6 consecutive odd numbers must be added.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes, Prime Factorisation

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To determine if 5832 is a perfect cube, we first find its prime factorisation:
$5832 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3 \times 3 \times 3 \times 3 \times 3 = 2^3 \times 3^6$
Since both prime factors ($2$ and $3$) appear in multiples of three, 5832 is indeed a perfect cube. Further, $(2 \times 3^2)^3 = 2^3 \times 3^6 = 5832$, so $\sqrt[3]{5832} = 18$.
Therefore, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason correctly explains why 5832 is a perfect cube.

Key Concept: Prime Factorisation of Cubes

c) $2^3 \times 3^3$
[Solution Description]
The cube of a number has each prime factor raised to three times its original power. For $6 = 2 \times 3$, its cube is:
$6^3 = (2 \times 3)^3 = 2^3 \times 3^3$

Key Concept: Properties of Cube Numbers

b) 3
[Solution Description]
Observing the last digit pattern for cubes, numbers ending with 7 have cubes ending with 3 because $7^3 = 343$. Thus, the cube of any number ending with 7 will also end with 3.

Key Concept: Cubes of Fractions/Decimals, Numerical Accuracy

c) 0.421875
[Solution Description]
To compute $\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^3$, multiply the numerator and denominator three times:
$\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^3 = \frac{3^3}{4^3} = \frac{27}{64}.$
Converting to decimal form gives $0.421875$.

Key Concept: Last Digit Pattern in Cubes

c) 3
[Solution Description]
From the pattern observed in cubes:
- Numbers ending with 7 have cubes ending with 3.
For example:
$7^3 = 343 \quad (\text{last digit is } 3)$
$17^3 = 4913 \quad (\text{last digit is } 3)$
Therefore, if a number ends with 7, its cube ends with 3.

Key Concept: Taxicab Number

c) 1729
[Solution Description]
A taxicab number is expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways. The smallest known example is 1729:
$1729 = 1^3 + 12^3 = 9^3 + 10^3$
Among the options, 1729 fits this property.

Key Concept: Taxicab Number Identification

b) $(2, 16)$
[Solution Description]
The number $4104$ is a taxicab number and satisfies:
$4104 = 2^3 + 16^3 = 9^3 + 15^3.$
Among the options, only $(2, 16)$ corresponds to one valid pair.

Key Concept: Cube Roots, Estimation

b) 23
[Solution Description]
Observe the last digit of 12167, which is 7. The cube of a number ending with 3 is the only cube ending with 7 (since $3^3 = 27$). Now, check the nearest cubes of two-digit numbers around 20-30:
- $20^3 = 8000$
- $25^3 = 15625$
- $23^3 = 12167$
Thus, $\sqrt[3]{12167} = 23$.

Key Concept: Cube Root

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The cube root of a number $n$ is the value that, when multiplied by itself three times, gives $n$. Here, $3 \times 3 \times 3 = 27$, so the cube root of 27 is indeed 3. Therefore, both the Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Cube Root and Prime Factorization

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To determine if the assertion is true, let's find the prime factorization of 2744:
$2744 \div 2 = 1372$
$1372 \div 2 = 686$
$686 \div 2 = 343$
$343 \div 7 = 49$
$49 \div 7 = 7$
$7 \div 7 = 1$
So, the prime factorization is $2^3 \times 7^3$. Each prime factor appears three times, meaning they can indeed be split into three identical groups ($2^3$ and $7^3$). Therefore, 2744 is a perfect cube. The reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Perfect Cube Identification

c) 64
[Solution Description]
A perfect cube is a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer. Checking each option:
$64 = 4 \times 4 \times 4 = 4^3$
64 is a perfect cube.

Key Concept: Cube Roots, Taxicab Numbers

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
To verify if 4104 is a taxicab number, we check if it can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two different ways. First, find the prime factorisation of 4104:
$4104 = 2^3 \times 3^3 \times 19$.
Now, express 4104 as sums of cubes:
1. $15^3 + 9^3 = 3375 + 729 = 4104$
2. $16^3 + 2^3 = 4096 + 8 = 4104$
Thus, 4104 is indeed a taxicab number. However, the Reason states that a taxicab number must have at least three distinct prime factors. While 4104 has three distinct prime factors (2, 3, 19), this is not a necessary condition for a taxicab number. For example, 1729 (another taxicab number) has only two distinct prime factors: $7 \times 13 \times 19$.
Therefore, Assertion is true, but Reason is false.

Key Concept: Taxicab Numbers, Prime Factorization

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion (A) states that 4104 is a taxicab number, which is correct as shown in the syllabus ($4104 = 2^3 + 16^3 = 9^3 + 15^3$).
The reason (R) claims that for any taxicab number, the prime factorization of its cube must have each prime factor appearing exactly three times. While this is true for any number's cube (as per the syllabus example: $12^3 = 2^3 \times 2^3 \times 3^3$), this property is not unique to taxicab numbers—it applies to all cubes. Therefore, while both statements are true, the reason does not explain why 4104 is a taxicab number; it merely states a general property of cubes.
Thus, the correct option is (b).

Key Concept: Taxicab Numbers

b) 1729
[Solution Description]
The smallest taxicab number is 1729, as famously mentioned by Srinivasa Ramanujan. It can be expressed as:
$1729 = 1^3 + 12^3$ and $1729 = 9^3 + 10^3$.

Key Concept: Taxicab Numbers, Sum of Cubes

d) 87539319
[Solution Description]
The smallest taxicab number expressible as a sum of two cubes in three distinct ways is 87539319. It can be written as:
$87539319 = 167^3 + 436^3 = 228^3 + 423^3 = 255^3 + 414^3$.

Key Concept: Square Pair Arrangement, Combinatorics

a) 1
[Solution Description]
Only one unique sequence exists for numbers 1 to 17 where adjacent pairs sum to a perfect square. For example, [8, 1, 15, 10, 6, 3, 13, 12, 4, 5, 11, 14, 2, 7, 9, 16] forms such a sequence (sums: 9, 16, 25, 16, 9, 16, 25, 16, 9, 16, 25, 16, 9, 16, 25).

Key Concept: Taxicab Numbers

b) 2
[Solution Description]
There are exactly two pairs of positive integers $(a, b)$ that satisfy $a^3 + b^3 = 1729$. These are $(1, 12)$ and $(9, 10)$, since $1^3 + 12^3 = 1729$ and $9^3 + 10^3 = 1729$.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes and Consecutive Odd Numbers

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To verify the assertion, let's analyze the given pattern:
- For $n=1$, the sum is $1 = 1^3$.
- For $n=2$, the sum is $3 + 5 = 8 = 2^3$.
- For $n=3$, the sum is $7 + 9 + 11 = 27 = 3^3$.
Observing the pattern, the sum of $n$ consecutive odd numbers (starting from the correct odd number) equals $n^3$. Here, there are $10$ terms ($n=10$) in the sum $91 + 93 + \ldots + 109$.
Calculating the mid-point of the range: $\frac{91 + 109}{2} = 100$.
Total sum = Mid-point $\times$ number of terms = $100 \times 10 = 1000 = 10^3$.
Thus, the sum is indeed a perfect cube.
The reason states that the sum of the first $n$ consecutive odd numbers starting from an appropriate odd number results in $n^3$. This is true as demonstrated by the pattern. However, the reason does not directly explain why the specific sum $91 + \ldots + 109$ equals $10^3$ but rather provides a general rule.
Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes and Consecutive Odd Numbers

b) $31 + 33 + 35 + 37 + 39 + 41$
[Solution Description]
To find the sequence of consecutive odd numbers whose sum is $216$, we refer to the pattern given in the syllabus. The sum of $n$ consecutive odd numbers starting from the appropriate term will be $n^3$. Here, $216 = 6^3$, so $n = 6$.
The first term of the sequence can be found using the formula for the first term of the $k^{th}$ group of consecutive odd numbers:
$\text{First term} = k^2 - k + 1$
For $k = 6$:
$\text{First term} = 6^2 - 6 + 1 = 36 - 6 + 1 = 31$
Thus, the sequence is $31, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41$.

Key Concept: Cube Roots

c) 9
[Solution Description]
We know that $9 \times 9 \times 9 = 729$. Therefore, $\sqrt[3]{729} = 9$.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes via Prime Factorisation

b) Yes, because it can be written as $6^3$.
[Solution Description]
Prime factorize the number 216:
$216 = 6 \times 6 \times 6 = (2 \times 3) \times (2 \times 3) \times (2 \times 3) = 2^3 \times 3^3 = (2 \times 3)^3 = 6^3$
Since the factors can be grouped into three identical groups, 216 is a perfect cube.

Key Concept: Cube Roots, Prime Factorisation

b) The cube root of $1728$ is $12$.
[Solution Description]
To determine the cube root of $1728$, we perform prime factorisation:
$1728 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3 \times 3$
Grouping into triplets:
$1728 = (2 \times 2 \times 2) \times (2 \times 2 \times 2) \times (3 \times 3 \times 3) = 2^3 \times 2^3 \times 3^3$
Simplifying:
$1728 = (2 \times 2 \times 3)^3 = 12^3$
Therefore, $\sqrt[3]{1728} = 12$.

Key Concept: First Differences in Cubic Numbers

c) 30
[Solution Description]
First, calculate the first differences for consecutive cubes:
$8 - 1 = 7, \quad 27 - 8 = 19, \quad 64 - 27 = 37, \quad 125 - 64 = 61, \quad 216 - 125 = 91.$
The question asks for the difference between the first differences of $216$ and $125$, which is $91 - 61 = 30$.

Key Concept: Third Differences in Cubic Numbers

d) 6
[Solution Description]
From the given data:
$19 - 7 = 12, \quad 37 - 19 = 18, \quad 61 - 37 = 24, \quad 91 - 61 = 30.$
The third differences are:
$18 - 12 = 6, \quad 24 - 18 = 6, \quad 30 - 24 = 6.$
The constant third difference is $6$.

Key Concept: Cube Roots, Patterns in Squares

a) 6
[Solution Description]
We need $n^3 \equiv 216 \ (\text{mod} \ 1000)$.
First, solve $n^3 \equiv 216 \ (\text{mod} \ 8)$:
$216 \equiv 0 \ (\text{mod} \ 8)$, so $n$ must be even.
Next, solve $n^3 \equiv 216 \ (\text{mod} \ 125)$:
$216 = 6^3$, so $n \equiv 6 \ (\text{mod} \ 5)$ (using Fermat's Little Theorem).
Combining, the smallest $n$ satisfying both is $6$ (since $6^3 = 216$, which ends with $216$).
However, checking higher candidates:
$16^3 = 4096$ (does not end with $216$),
$26^3 = 17576$ (ends with $576$),
$36^3 = 46656$ (ends with $656$),
$46^3 = 97336$ (ends with $336$),
$56^3 = 175616$ (ends with $616$),
$66^3 = 287496$ (ends with $496$),
$76^3 = 438976$ (ends with $976$),
$86^3 = 636056$ (ends with $056$),
$96^3 = 884736$ (ends with $736$),
$106^3 = 1191016$ (ends with $016$),
$116^3 = 1560896$ (ends with $896$),
$126^3 = 2000376$ (ends with $376$),
$136^3 = 2515456$ (ends with $456$),
$146^3 = 3112136$ (ends with $136$),
$156^3 = 3796416$ (ends with $416$),
$166^3 = 4574296$ (ends with $296$),
$176^3 = 5451776$ (ends with $776$),
$186^3 = 6434856$ (ends with $856$),
$196^3 = 7529536$ (ends with $536$).
The pattern repeats every $100$ units. The smallest such $n$ is $6 + 100k$ where $k$ is an integer. Here, $6$ is the smallest.

Key Concept: Second Differences in Cubic Numbers

b) 18
[Solution Description]
Calculate the first differences:
$8 - 1 = 7, \quad 27 - 8 = 19, \quad 64 - 27 = 37.$
Now, compute the second difference:
$37 - 19 = 18.$

Key Concept: Cubic Numbers: Successive Differences

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To verify the assertion and reason, let's compute the successive differences for perfect cubes (a cubic polynomial sequence):
1. **First-level differences**:
$8 - 1 = 7, \quad 27 - 8 = 19, \quad 64 - 27 = 37, \quad 125 - 64 = 61, \ldots$
2. **Second-level differences**:
$19 - 7 = 12, \quad 37 - 19 = 18, \quad 61 - 37 = 24, \ldots$
3. **Third-level differences**:
$18 - 12 = 6, \quad 24 - 18 = 6, \ldots$
The differences stabilize at the third level. The reason states a general property of polynomial sequences, where a degree $n$ polynomial stabilizes after $n$ levels of differences. Since perfect cubes are degree 3 polynomials, the assertion aligns with the reason.

Key Concept: Ancient Mathematical Terminology

b) Cube root
[Solution Description]
In ancient Sanskrit mathematics, the term *ghana* was used for the cube of a number or the solid cube figure, and *mula* means root (origin). Hence, *ghana-mula* refers to the cube root.

Key Concept: Origin of the Term 'Root'

c) Because it represented the basis or origin of a square/cube
[Solution Description]
The term *mula* was used because it signified the basis or origin of a square or cube, similar to how roots are the basis of plants. This terminology influenced Arabic (*jidhr*) and Latin (*radix*).

Key Concept: Historical Context

b) Due to its symbolic meaning of origin or base
[Solution Description]
The word *mula* in Sanskrit means "root of a plant," which symbolically represents the origin or basis. This metaphorical usage was extended to mathematical roots, as they represent the base value from which powers (like squares or cubes) are derived.

Key Concept: Sanskrit Terminology

b) Both the square figure and the square power
[Solution Description]
As per Aryabhata's description, *varga* refers to both the square figure (or its area) and the square power (product of two equal quantities).

Key Concept: Historical Origin of Mathematical Terms

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]

The term $\textit{varga-mula}$ indeed refers to the square root in Sanskrit, as it combines $\textit{varga}$ (square) and $\textit{mula}$ (root). The reason correctly explains that $\textit{mula}$ was used to denote the origin or basis of a square, and this concept was later adopted in Arabic $(\textit{jidhr})$ and Latin $(\textit{radix}),$ eventually leading to the modern term "root." Thus, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Cube roots, Perfect cubes, Sanskrit terminology

c) ghana-mula of 10648 is 22
[Solution Description]
The problem involves finding the cube root of 10648 and understanding its representation in Sanskrit terms.
Step 1: Find prime factorization of 10648.
$10648 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 11 \times 11 \times 11 = 2^3 \times 11^3$
Step 2: Calculate cube root:
$\sqrt[3]{10648} = 2 \times 11 = 22$
Step 3: In Sanskrit terminology:
- Cube is called "ghana"
- Cube root is called "ghana-mula"
Thus, 22 is the ghana-mula of 10648.

Key Concept: Properties of Cubes

d) All of the above are false.
[Solution Description] Let's evaluate each statement:
(i) The cube of any odd number is even - False, as the cube of an odd number remains odd.
(ii) There is no perfect cube that ends with 8 - False, as $2^3 = 8$ and $12^3 = 1728$, which end with 8.
(iii) The cube of a 2-digit number may be a 3-digit number - True, e.g., $4^3 = 64$ and $5^3 = 125$.
(iv) The cube of a 2-digit number may have seven or more digits - False, as the largest 2-digit number is 99 and $99^3 = 970299$, a 6-digit number.
(v) Cube numbers have an odd number of factors - True, as they are perfect squares of their cube roots.
The false statements are (i) and (ii).

Key Concept: Perfect cubes, Multiplication factors

c) 36, ghana
[Solution Description]
To find the smallest multiplier to make 8232 a perfect cube and identify its correct Sanskrit terminology.
Step 1: Factorize 8232:
$8232 = 2^3 \times 3 \times 7^3 \times 2 = 2^4 \times 3^1 \times 7^3$
Step 2: For perfect cube, all exponents must be multiples of 3:
- Need 2 more 2's (to make exponent 6)
- Need 2 more 3's (to make exponent 3)
- 7's exponent is already 3
Step 3: Multiplier needed:
$2^2 \times 3^2 = 4 \times 9 = 36$
Step 4: Brahmagupta would call the perfect cube "krti" (square) or "ghana" (cube), but since it's a perfect cube, "ghana" is correct.

Key Concept: Cube Roots and Perfect Cubes

c) 30
[Solution Description] To find the cube root of 27000, we factorize it:
$27000 = 27 \times 1000 = 3^3 \times 10^3 = (3 \times 10)^3 = 30^3$
Thus, the cube root of 27000 is 30.

Key Concept: Babylonian Lists

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the Babylonians compiled the first known list of perfect squares and cubes around 1700 BCE, which is true as historical records confirm this. The reason given is that these lists were used for land measurement and architectural design, which is also true and correctly explains why the Babylonians needed such lists. Thus, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Mathematical Term Origin

d) Originated from the Sanskrit word $mula$.
[Solution Description]
The term ‘root’ comes from the Sanskrit word $mula$, meaning the root of a plant, basis, or origin, which was used for operations involving roots in ancient India.

Key Concept: Ancient Mathematical Terminology

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the term $varga$ was used in ancient India to refer to both the square figure and its area as well as the square power. This is true as per the given syllabus text which mentions, "In ancient Sanskrit works the term $varga$ was used both for the square figure or its area, as well as the square power."
The reason states that this usage originates from the graphical representation of a square figure. This is also true as Aryabhata's statement explains, "Thus, the term $varga$ for square power has its origin in the graphical representation of a square figure."
Moreover, the reason correctly explains why $varga$ was used for square power, linking it to the visual basis of the concept. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Historical Mathematical Terms, Sanskrit Origins

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that $\textit{varga-mula}$ denotes the square root as it signifies the origin/basis $(mula)$ of a square $(varga),$ which is true based on historical Sanskrit usage. The reason claims that the concept of roots originated from the graphical representation of squares/cubes in ancient Indian texts, which is also true but does not directly explain why $\textit{mula}$ (root) was specifically chosen for the mathematical operation. While the terms were indeed derived from geometric representations, the immediate explanation lies in the meaning of $\textit{mula}$ itself (basis/origin), not just the graphical connection. Hence, both statements are true, but the reason does not correctly explain the assertion.

Key Concept: Historical terms in mathematics, Square roots, Varga-mula

b) Basis of the square power
[Solution Description]
The term 'varga-mula' was used for square root in ancient India. It literally means "the basis/origin of the square" ('varga' = square, 'mula' = root/basis). This relates to finding the original number that was squared to obtain a given value. Aryabhata and Brahmagupta explained this concept where mula represents the root operation.

Key Concept: Concept: Historical use of mathematical terms in India

c) Varga
[Solution Description]
The term $varga$ was used in ancient Sanskrit works for both the square figure or its area and the square power. Aryabhata (499 CE) explicitly mentions this usage.

Key Concept: Cube Roots

c) 17
[Solution Description]
Observing the pattern of perfect cubes:
- $17^3 = 4913$.
This can be deduced by checking nearby integers since $16^3 = 4096$ and $18^3 = 5832$.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes and Their Properties

c) 64
[Solution Description]
A perfect cube is a number that can be expressed as $n^3$ where $n$ is an integer. Checking each option:
$64 = 4^3$
Hence, 64 is a perfect cube.

Key Concept: Taxicab Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that 1729 is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways. This is true, as verified by the equations $1729 = 1^3 + 12^3$ and $1729 = 9^3 + 10^3$. The Reason correctly explains why Ramanujan considered 1729 special, linking it directly to the Assertion. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Historical Context

d) Srinivasa Ramanujan
[Solution Description]
Srinivasa Ramanujan identified 1729 as the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways:
$1729 = 1^3 + 12^3 = 9^3 + 10^3$
This discovery was made during his conversation with G.H. Hardy.

Key Concept: Famous Mathematicians

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 1729 is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways, which is true ($1729 = 1^3 + 12^3 = 9^3 + 10^3$). The reason explains Ramanujan's talent for recognizing numerical patterns, which is also true and directly explains why he identified this property of 1729. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Mula, Square Root

c) It symbolized the origin or basis of the number
[Solution Description]
The Sanskrit word 'mula' means the root of a plant, basis, cause, or origin. It was metaphorically extended to describe the mathematical operation of finding roots because it signifies the 'origin' or 'basis' of a number (e.g., the number that, when squared or cubed, gives the original number). For example, $\sqrt{x}$ finds the 'origin' of $x$ (the number which squared gives $x$).

Key Concept: Basic Concept: Varga and Ghana Definitions

b) The square figure or its area and the square power of a number
[Solution Description]
According to Aryabhata, the term *varga* refers to both the square figure or its area and the square power of a number.

Key Concept: Perfect Cubes, Historical Terminology

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that $\textit{varga-mula}$ was used to denote the square root due to its connection with the origin of squares. This is correct as per historical records where $\textit{mula}$ (root) was used for the mathematical operation of taking roots. The Reason states that Aryabhata introduced $\textit{varga}$ for square numbers and the squaring operation, which is also true based on his work. However, the Reason does not explain why $\textit{varga-mula}$ denotes the square root; it only provides information about $\textit{varga}.$ Thus, both statements are true, but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Assertion-Reason

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]

Key Concept: Cube Roots

c) 30
[Solution Description]
To find the cube root of 27000, we can perform prime factorization:
$27000 = 27 \times 1000 = 3^3 \times 10^3 = (3 \times 10)^3$. Therefore, $\sqrt[3]{27000} = 30$.