Key Concept: Human Need for Counting, Origin of Modern Numbers

d) $āyuta$
[Solution Description]
The Yajurveda Samhita lists number names based on powers of 10. According to the text, $āyuta$ represents ten thousand ($10^4$).

Key Concept: Mesopotamian numerals, Hindu-Arabic numeral system

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
First, let's verify the Assertion: The Mesopotamian numeral system indeed used a base-60 (sexagesimal) system, while the Hindu-Arabic numeral system uses base-10. This part of the Assertion is true.
Now, examine the Reason: The base of numeral systems often reflects practical human needs. For example, base-10 is common due to counting on 10 fingers, while base-60 (used in Mesopotamia) may have been chosen for its divisibility (useful in astronomy and timekeeping). Thus, the Reason is also true.
Does the Reason correctly explain the Assertion? Yes, because the difference in bases between the two systems can be attributed to their different practical and cultural contexts, as stated in the Reason.
Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Historical Context of Numbers

d) Indians
[Solution Description]
The Indian civilization is credited with developing the modern numerical system, including the digit 0 (initially represented as a dot), around 2000 years ago. This system was later transmitted to the Arab world and then to Europe. The key figures in this transmission were Al-Khwārizmī and Fibonacci.

Key Concept: Early human need for counting

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that early humans needed to count livestock for trade and survival, which is true as per the syllabus. The reason given is that counting helped them track the number of animals they owned, which is also true and directly explains why they needed to count livestock.

Key Concept: Transmission of Indian Numerals

d) Al-Khwārizmī
[Solution Description]
Al-Khwārizmī wrote the book *On the Calculation with Hindu Numerals* in 825 CE, which was instrumental in introducing Indian numerals to the Arab world.

Key Concept: Ancient Indian Numerals

c) A dot
[Solution Description]
In the Bakhshali manuscript, which dates back to the 3rd century CE, the digit zero was represented as a dot.

Key Concept: Origin of Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion is true as the Hindu-Arabic numeral system did indeed originate in India and was later transmitted to the Arab world. The reason is also true because the introduction of 0 as both a digit and a number revolutionized mathematics and science. Furthermore, the reason correctly explains why the Hindu-Arabic numeral system was significant, as it included the concept of zero, which was a major mathematical advancement.

Key Concept: Landmark Numbers

c) Easily recognizable reference numbers
[Solution Description]
Landmark numbers are easily recognizable numbers used as reference points for understanding other numbers. They help people make sense of quantities, especially larger ones.

Key Concept: Indian numeral system, evolution of zero

c) Defining arithmetic properties of zero
[Solution Description]
Brahmagupta formalized the arithmetic rules for zero as both a digit and a number. He defined operations like addition ($a + 0 = a$) and subtraction ($a - 0 = a$), which were crucial for modern mathematics. The Bakhshali manuscript introduced zero as a dot, but Brahmagupta expanded its use.

Key Concept: Origin of Numbers

c) India
[Solution Description]
The modern number system, which includes digits 0 to 9, originated in India around 2000 years ago. This system was later transmitted to the Arab world and then to Europe.

Key Concept: Origin of Numbers, Hindu-Arabic Numerals

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the digit 0 being introduced as a number revolutionized mathematics. This is true because, before its introduction, computations were limited. The Reason explains how zero was treated as a number with specific arithmetic properties, which is also true. Moreover, the Reason correctly explains the Assertion since these properties of zero enabled more advanced mathematical operations and theories to develop, such as algebra and analysis. Therefore, both the Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Mesopotamian numerals, Indian numeral system, spread of numbers

a) 45
[Solution Description]
Mesopotamians used a base-60 (sexagesimal) system. The number 45 in their system would be represented as $45_{60}$. To convert to decimal, we calculate:
$4 \times 60^1 + 5 \times 60^0 = 4 \times 60 + 5 \times 1 = 240 + 5 = 245.$
However, the question asks for representing 45 in their symbols and converting back to decimal, so the correct answer is 45 itself.

Key Concept: Tally Marks

b) As a lunar calendar or counting aid.
[Solution Description]
The Lebombo bone's notches suggest it might have been used as a lunar calendar, tracking phases of the moon over time. Alternatively, it could have served as a simple tally stick to count objects like days, animals, or resources, given the prehistoric context where such markers were common for record-keeping.

Key Concept: One-to-one mapping, Counting with sticks

a) 18
[Solution Description]
In Method 1, each stick represents one goat. If the shepherd has 23 sticks but 5 are broken, those broken sticks do not correspond to any goats.
Calculation:
Total sticks = 23
Broken sticks = 5
Effective sticks (representing goats) = $23 - 5 = 18$
Therefore, the shepherd has 18 goats.

Key Concept: Counting Methods

b) It cannot count collections with more than 26 objects.
[Solution Description]
Using the English alphabet limits counting because there are only 26 distinct letters available. Therefore, collections larger than 26 objects cannot be counted using this method without repetition or modification of the sequence, making it impractical beyond small quantities.

Key Concept: One-to-one mapping, Alphabet-based counting

c) 11
[Solution Description]
In Method 2, each letter of the alphabet represents a number starting from "a" as 1, "b" as 2, and so on.
The position of "k" in the English alphabet is the 11th letter.
Calculation:
- a = 1
- b = 2
- ...
- k = 11
Therefore, the farmer has 11 chickens.

Key Concept: Number Representation

b) 26
[Solution Description]
The English alphabet consists of 26 letters ('a' to 'z'). In Method 2, each letter represents a unique number, starting from 'a' for 1 up to 'z' for 26. Therefore, the maximum number that can be represented using this method is 26.

Key Concept: One-to-One Mapping

a) Using pebbles or sticks
[Solution Description]
The method described involves creating a one-to-one mapping between each cow and a stick. This ensures that each cow is uniquely represented by a stick, allowing for accurate counting. This technique is known as one-to-one mapping, where no two cows are associated with the same stick.

Key Concept: Use of Body Parts

c) People in Papua New Guinea
[Solution Description]
The syllabus mentions that people in Papua New Guinea used their body parts as the standard sequence/number system for counting.

Key Concept: Mayan Number System, Hindu Number System

d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the Mayan system's use of a placeholder for zero was as advanced as the Hindu number system. This is false because while the Mayans did use a placeholder for zero, they did not treat it as a number with arithmetic properties like the Hindus did. The Reason claims that both systems recognized zero as both a digit and a number with arithmetic properties, which is also false because the Mayans only used zero as a placeholder, not as a number. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are false.

Key Concept: Assertion-Reason

d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description]
The Mayan number system primarily used a base-20 system but introduced a third landmark number at 360, likely due to its calendar system. This made it not a pure base-20 system and complicated computations. Therefore, the Assertion is false as the system was not purely base-20, while the Reason correctly explains why the system was not purely base-20 due to the introduction of the 360 landmark number.

Key Concept: Mayan Number System

c) Three dots at the top and three bars and two dots at the bottom
[Solution Description]
The Mayan number system uses dots for 1 and bars for 5. For numbers up to 19, a dot represents 1 and a bar represents 5. For numbers above 19, they use a base-20 system with each higher position representing multiples of 20.
To represent 77 in the Mayan system:
1. Divide 77 by 20: $77 \div 20 = 3$ with remainder 17.
2. The remainder 17 is written as three bars (each bar is 5) and two dots (each dot is 1), i.e., ---$\cdot$$\cdot$.
3. The quotient 3 is written as three dots, i.e., $\cdot$$\cdot$$\cdot$, in the next higher position.
4. Combining them gives $\cdot$$\cdot$$\cdot$ below ---$\cdot$$\cdot$.
Thus, the correct representation is three dots at the top and three bars and two dots at the bottom.

Key Concept: Chinese Rod Numerals

b) Base-10
[Solution Description]
The Chinese rod numeral system was developed for computation and uses distinct symbols for digits 1 to 9. It follows a decimal (base-10) system, where each position represents a power of 10. This system allowed efficient arithmetic operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
Therefore, the correct answer is base-10.

Key Concept: Body-Part Number Representation

d) Index finger of the left hand
[Solution Description]
According to the given sequence, the number $4$ is represented by the index finger of the left hand.

Key Concept: Body part counting

c) 2 complete counts
[Solution Description]
First, we need to understand that one complete count means using all 10 fingers (both hands). To find out how many complete counts are needed for 15:
Step 1: Divide 15 by 10 (fingers per count) = 1.5 counts
Step 2: Since they can't do half counts, they would need to round up to 2 complete counts (using fingers twice)

Key Concept: Extension of Body Parts Counting System

c) 27
[Solution Description]
Since the system uses both sides symmetrically:
Step 1: Total unique parts per side = 15.
Step 2: Right knee is 12th part, so left knee will be $12 + 15 = 27$.
Step 3: Hence, left knee corresponds to the 27th count.

Key Concept: Body-Part Number Representation

b) Elbow of the left arm
[Solution Description]
According to the sequence, the number $7$ is represented by the elbow of the left arm.

Key Concept: Scalability of Body Parts Counting System

c) 16
[Solution Description]
Given each joint counts as 5 units:
Step 1: Wrist (6) to elbow (11) covers $11 - 6 = 5$ units (as expected).
Step 2: Similarly, elbow (11) to shoulder will also cover 5 units.
Step 3: Thus, right shoulder = $11 + 5 = 16$.

Key Concept: Body Parts Counting System, Limitations

b) Right elbow
[Solution Description]
To find the 50th count in a repeating sequence of 27 body parts:
Step 1: Divide 50 by 27 to find the complete cycles and remainder.
Step 2: $50 ÷ 27 = 1$ cycle with a remainder of $23$.
Step 3: The 50th count corresponds to the 23rd body part in the sequence.

Key Concept: Tally Marks on Bones and Other Surfaces

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the Ishango bone's tally marks are arranged in columns, possibly indicating a calendrical system. Archaeological evidence supports this claim, as the notches on the Ishango bone are grouped in patterns that may represent lunar cycles or other time-keeping methods.
The Reason claims that tally marks on ancient bones were solely used for simple counting. However, this is false because archaeological findings like the Ishango and Lebombo bones suggest these tally marks had more complex uses beyond just counting, such as tracking lunar months or calendrical systems.
Thus, the Assertion is true, but the Reason is false.

Key Concept: Tally Marks on Bones

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the Ishango bone has notches arranged in columns, which is true as mentioned in the syllabus. The Reason suggests that these notches could represent a calendrical system, which is also mentioned in the syllabus as a possible interpretation. Furthermore, the Reason correctly explains why the notches are arranged in columns, indicating a potential calendrical system.

Key Concept: Historical Number Systems

c) It is among the earliest known tally systems
[Solution Description]
The Lebombo bone, found in South Africa, has 29 notches and is one of the oldest mathematical artifacts (around 44,000 years old). Its markings suggest it was used as a tally stick or lunar calendar.

Key Concept: Counting in groups, Human perception limit

c) 33
[Solution Description]
Each new symbol represents 7 marks, so 4 symbols represent $4 \times 7 = 28$ marks. Adding the 5 separate marks gives the total count: $28 + 5 = 33$.

Key Concept: Tally Marks and Early Counting Methods

b) Counting objects by making individual marks
[Solution Description]
Tally marks were one of the oldest methods used to represent numbers by making notches on surfaces like bones or cave walls. Each mark represented a single object being counted, and the collection of marks indicated the total count. This method was simple and did not require physical objects like sticks or pebbles.

Key Concept: Tally Marks and Early Number Systems

a) Representing lunar phases
[Solution Description]
The Ishango bone, discovered in the Democratic Republic of Congo, features notches arranged in columns. These markings are thought to represent numbers and may indicate a calendrical system or tally counting method.

Key Concept: Number names by counting in twos, Bakairi system

b) t'oa-t'oa-t'oa-t'oa
[Solution Description]
The Bakairi system counts in twos:
1: xa
2: t'oa
3: 'quo
4: t'oa-t'oa
5: t'oa-t'oa-t'a
6: t'oa-t'oa-t'oa
To represent 8, we note that 8 = 6 + 2. Since 6 is t'oa-t'oa-t'oa and 2 is t'oa, the logical extension would be t'oa-t'oa-t'oa-t'oa.

Key Concept: Number names by counting in twos

a) ras
[Solution Description]
According to the Gumulgal system:
- Numbers greater than 6 are called "ras."
- The exact representation for numbers beyond 6 is not detailed, but since 9 = 6 + 3, and 6 is represented as ukasar-ukasar-ukasar, we can infer that 9 might be represented as "ras" with some additional notation or context.
However, based on the given information, any number >6 is simply called "ras."
Therefore, 9 would also be called "ras."

Key Concept: Assertion-Reason

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the Gumulgal number system constructs the name for 5 as ukasar-ukasar-urapon, which is correct because $5 = 2 + 2 + 1$ and hence the name ukasar (2) repeated twice followed by urapon (1). The reason states that numbers greater than 6 are called ras because they rely on counting by twos. This is also true, but it does not explain why the name for 5 is constructed as given in the assertion. It only explains another aspect of the Gumulgal number system. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Roman Number System

c) XIV
[Solution Description]
In the Roman number system, 14 is represented by combining the symbols for 10 (X) and 4 (IV), giving XIV.

Key Concept: Number Names by Counting in Twos

c) They all represent numbers by counting in twos.
[Solution Description]
All three groups use a counting system based on grouping numbers in twos. Their number names are formed by combining words for smaller numbers (especially 2 and 1) to represent larger numbers.

Key Concept: Number Names in Gumulgal System

d) ukasar-ukasar-urapon
[Solution Description]
In the Gumulgal system, numbers are formed by counting in twos. For 5, the representation is $2 + 2 + 1$, which translates to ukasar-ukasar-urapon.

Key Concept: Representation of Numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To verify Assertion (A), let's break down the Roman numeral $MDCLXVI$:
- M = 1000
- D = 500
- C = 100
- L = 50
- X = 10
- V = 5
- I = 1
Adding them up: $1000 + 500 + 100 + 50 + 10 + 5 + 1 = 1666$. So, Assertion is true.
Reason (R) states that symbols are added from left to right in descending order. This is correct because in $MDCLXVI$, the symbols are ordered as M (1000), D (500), C (100), L (50), X (10), V (5), I (1), which follows descending order. Moreover, Reason correctly explains why the assertion is true, as this ordering rule ensures accurate addition. Thus, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Roman numerals arithmetic, addition

a) MCCXI
[Solution Description]
To add $DCCLXVII$ ($767$) and $CDXLIV$ ($444$):
1. Convert to Hindu-Arabic numerals: $DCCLXVII = 500 + 200 + 50 + 10 + 5 + 1 + 1 = 767$; $CDXLIV = (500 - 100) + (50 - 10) + (5 - 1) = 444$.
2. Add the numbers: $767 + 444 = 1211$.
3. Convert back to Roman numerals: $1211 = 1000 + 100 + 100 + 10 + 1 = MCCXI$.

Key Concept: Roman numerals and landmark numbers

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To convert 999 to Roman numerals:
900 is represented as CM (1000 - 100),
90 as XC (100 - 10),
and 9 as IX (10 - 1).
Thus, 999 = CMXCIX, confirming the Assertion.
The Reason correctly explains that the subtractive principle (like IV for 4 or IX for 9) was used but not always consistently, as mentioned in the syllabus regarding the representation of 40 as XL or XXXX.

Key Concept: Roman Numeral Addition

b) XIX
[Solution Description]
First, convert both Roman numerals to Hindu-Arabic numbers:
Step 1: XII = 10 + 1 + 1 = 12.
Step 2: VII = 5 + 1 + 1 = 7.
Step 3: Add them together: 12 + 7 = 19.
Step 4: Convert 19 back to Roman numerals: 19 = 10 + 9 = XIX.
Therefore, the sum is XIX.

Key Concept: Basic Roman Numeral Conversion

c) XV
[Solution Description]
To convert the number 15 to Roman numerals, we use the landmark numbers: V (5) and X (10).
Step 1: Since 15 = 10 + 5.
Step 2: The Roman numeral for 10 is X, and for 5 is V.
Therefore, 15 in Roman numerals is XV.

Key Concept: Roman Numeral Representation

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
To represent 45 in Roman numerals:
1. Start with the largest landmark number less than or equal to 45, which is L (50).
2. Since 40 is 10 less than 50, we write XL (where X is 10 and L is 50).
3. Add V (5) to make it 45, resulting in XLV.
The Reason correctly explains the subtraction rule used in the Assertion (X before L means 50 - 10 = 40).

Key Concept: Base-5 Number System

c) 200
[Solution Description]
To convert 50 to base-5, we divide the number by successive powers of 5. The largest power of 5 less than 50 is $5^3 = 125$, which is too large, so we start with $5^2 = 25$. Divide 50 by 25: $50 \div 25 = 2$ with remainder 0. Next, divide the remaining part (0) by $5^1 = 5$: $0 \div 5 = 0$ with remainder 0. Finally, divide by $5^0 = 1$: $0 \div 1 = 0$ with remainder 0. Thus, 50 in base-5 is written as 200.

Key Concept: Base Number System

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
In a base-$n$ number system, any non-negative integer can be uniquely represented as a sum of distinct powers of $n$ with coefficients ranging from 0 to $(n-1)$. For example, in base-5, the number 143 is expressed as $125 + 3 \times 5 + 3 \times 1$, i.e., $1 \times 5^3 + 0 \times 5^2 + 3 \times 5^1 + 3 \times 5^0$. This unique representation is possible because the base-$n$ system ensures that each number has a distinct combination of coefficients for the powers of $n$. Therefore, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason correctly explains Assertion.

Key Concept: Base conversion, Grouping principle

b) 514 in base-7
[Solution Description]
To represent 256 in base-7:
Step 1: Find the largest power of 7 less than or equal to 256.
$7^3 = 343$ is too large. So, $7^2 = 49$ comes first.
Step 2: Divide 256 by 49. We get 5 with remainder $256 - (49 \times 5) = 11$.
Step 3: Divide the remainder 11 by $7^1 = 7$. We get 1 with remainder $11 - 7 = 4$.
Step 4: The remaining 4 is represented by $7^0 = 1$ units.
Thus, $256 = 5 \times 7^2 + 1 \times 7^1 + 4 \times 7^0$, which is written as 514 in base-7.

Key Concept: Representation in Base-5

b) 5 + 1 + 1
[Solution Description]
In base-5, landmark numbers are 1, 5, 25, etc. To represent 7, we use one 5 and two 1's: $5 + 1 + 1 = 7$.

Key Concept: Concept merging, Base comparison

c) 1210 in base-4
[Solution Description]
Step 1: Find the largest power of 4 less than or equal to 100.
$4^3 = 64$ is the largest.
Step 2: Divide 100 by 64. Quotient is 1, remainder is $100 - 64 = 36$.
Step 3: Divide 36 by $4^2 = 16$. Quotient is 2, remainder is $36 - 32 = 4$.
Step 4: Divide 4 by $4^1 = 4$. Quotient is 1, remainder is 0.
Step 5: Final representation is $1 \times 4^3 + 2 \times 4^2 + 1 \times 4^1 + 0 \times 4^0 = 1210$ (base-4).

Key Concept: Advantage of Base-n Systems

b) Because multiplication in base-n involves only addition of exponents
[Solution Description]
In a base-n system, the landmark numbers are powers of n, so multiplying two landmark numbers results in another landmark number (e.g., $10^a \times 10^b = 10^{a+b}$). This simplifies multiplication because it reduces to adding exponents. In contrast, the Roman numeral system does not have landmark numbers as powers of a fixed base, making multiplication complex and less systematic.

Key Concept: Grouping by Different Base

d) 25
[Solution Description]
In this system:
$1^{st} \text{ landmark } = 1 \\ \\ 2^{nd} \text{ landmark } = 5 \times 1 = 5 \\ \\ 3^{rd} \text{ landmark } = 5 \times 5 = 25$
Thus, the third landmark number is 25.

Key Concept: Assertion-Reason

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the Egyptian number system uses base 10 for grouping numbers, which is true as the system groups numbers in powers of 10 (e.g., 1, 10, 100, etc.). The Reason explains that each new landmark number is formed by grouping 10 collections of the previous landmark number, which is also true and correctly justifies the Assertion. Therefore, both the Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.

Key Concept: Multiplication in Egyptian Numerals

c) 1000
[Solution Description]
In the Egyptian system, each multiplication of a landmark number by 10 results in the next landmark number:
- $10 × 1 = 10$ (second landmark number).
- $10 × 10 = 100$ (third landmark number).
- Therefore, $10 × 100 = 1000$ (fourth landmark number).

Key Concept: Egyptian Number System and Base Concept

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the Egyptian number system uses a base of 10 because it groups numbers in powers of 10. This is true as the system's landmark numbers are defined as powers of 10 (1, 10, 100, etc.). The Reason explains that each landmark number is 10 times the previous one, which is also true and directly supports why the system is base-10. Thus, the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Landmark Numbers in Egyptian System

b) 3
[Solution Description]
The Egyptian system uses powers of 10 as landmark numbers: 1, 10, 100, 1000, etc. To represent 7,250, we break it down as:
$7,250 = 7 \times 1000 + 2 \times 100 + 5 \times 10$
Here, the landmark numbers used are 1000, 100, and 10. Since each power of 10 is a distinct symbol, the total landmark numbers needed are 3.

Key Concept: Shortcomings of the Egyptian System

c) It required an unending sequence of symbols for higher powers of $10$
[Solution Description]
The Egyptian number system required an unending sequence of symbols for higher powers of $10$ as numbers grew larger, making it impractical for very large representations.

Key Concept: Base Systems, Multiplication

b) $432_5$
[Solution Description]
Convert $14_5$ and $23_5$ to decimal:
$14_5 = 1 \times 5^1 + 4 \times 5^0 = 9$.
$23_5 = 2 \times 5^1 + 3 \times 5^0 = 13$.
Product in decimal: $9 \times 13 = 117$.
Convert 117 to base-5:
$117 \div 5 = 23$ with remainder $2$,
$23 \div 5 = 4$ with remainder $3$,
$4 \div 5 = 0$ with remainder $4$.
Reading remainders from bottom to top: $432_5$.

Key Concept: Base System Representation

b) 12
[Solution Description]
To represent 7 in base-5, we find the largest power of 5 less than or equal to 7, which is $5^1 = 5$. We can subtract 5 from 7 to get 2. So, 7 in base-5 is represented as $12_5$ (1 group of 5 and 2 units).

Key Concept: Egyptian System Multiplication

b) 10
[Solution Description]
The first landmark number in the Egyptian system is 1, and the second landmark number is 10. The product of these two numbers is $1 \times 10 = 10$.

Key Concept: Base-5 Representation

d) $111_5$
[Solution Description]
To convert $31_{10}$ to base-5, divide 31 by powers of 5:
$31 \div 25 = 1 \text{ with remainder } 6 \\ \\ 6 \div 5 = 1 \text{ with remainder } 1 \\ \\ 1 \div 1 = 1 \text{ with remainder } 0$
Combining the coefficients gives $111_5$.

Key Concept: Multiplication in Base-7

a) $130_7$
[Solution Description]
First, convert $20_7$ and $5_7$ to base-10:
$20_7 = 2 \times 7^1 + 0 \times 7^0 = 14_{10} \\ \\ 5_7 = 5 \times 7^0 = 5_{10}$
Multiply them in base-10:
$14 \times 5 = 70_{10}$
Convert back to base-7 by dividing by powers of 7:
$70 \div 49 = 1 \text{ with remainder } 21 \\ \\ 21 \div 7 = 3 \text{ with remainder } 0 \\ \\ 0 \div 1 = 0 \text{ with remainder } 0$
Combining the coefficients gives $130_7$.

Key Concept: Efficient Representation in Base-n System

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the base-5 number system can represent the number 143 using a combination of its landmark numbers. This is true because any number can be expressed as a sum of multiples of landmark numbers (powers of the base). The Reason explains that the landmark numbers in base-5 are powers of 5, which helps in compact representation by grouping large quantities. This correctly justifies the Assertion since the systematic grouping allows efficient representation. Thus, both the Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Base-n System: Grouping Efficiency

b) $3 \times 25 + 0 \times 5 + 3 \times 1$
[Solution Description]
To express 78 in base-5, we use the largest landmark numbers (powers of 5) less than or equal to 78. The landmark numbers are $5^0 = 1$, $5^1 = 5$, $5^2 = 25$, and $5^3 = 125$ (which is greater than 78). Divide 78 by 25 ($5^2$) to get 3 with a remainder of 3. Next, divide the remainder (3) by 5 ($5^1$) to get 0 with a remainder of 3. Finally, divide the remaining 3 by 1 ($5^0$) to get 3. Thus, 78 in base-5 is represented as $3 \times 25 + 0 \times 5 + 3 \times 1$.

Key Concept: Efficient Representation, Simplified Arithmetic

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
First, we need to verify the assertion (A). Converting 143 to base-5:
Step 1: Find the largest power of 5 less than or equal to 143, which is $5^3 = 125$.
Step 2: Divide 143 by 125 to get quotient 1 and remainder 18.
Step 3: Next, divide 18 by $5^2 = 25$, but since 25 > 18, the coefficient is 0.
Step 4: Now divide 18 by $5^1 = 5$ to get quotient 3 and remainder 3.
Step 5: Finally, divide the remainder 3 by $5^0 = 1$ to get coefficient 3.
Thus, $143_{10} = 1 \times 5^3 + 0 \times 5^2 + 3 \times 5^1 + 3 \times 5^0 = 1033_5$. This representation is indeed more efficient than non-positional systems.
Now, check the reason (R): The base-n system simplifies arithmetic by using powers of the base for grouping, which is true. However, this does not directly explain why $143_{10}$ can be represented as $1033_5$, as stated in the assertion. Hence, both are true, but the reason does not correctly explain the assertion.

Key Concept: Simplified Arithmetic

c) Because of the positional value of digits.
[Solution Description] The positional nature of the base-n system makes operations like addition and subtraction systematic, as they involve digit-wise calculations with carry-over.

Key Concept: Efficient Representation

c) It allows unique representation of numbers using a fixed set of digits.
[Solution Description] The base-n system allows every number to be uniquely represented using digits from $0$ to $n-1$, eliminating the need for multiple symbols for different landmark numbers.

Key Concept: Shortcomings of Egyptian System

b) It involved complex calculations for simple multiplications.
[Solution Description]
In the Egyptian system, multiplication was more complex compared to addition and subtraction. It required understanding that each landmark number is a power of 10 and applying this logic manually for each operation. For example, multiplying $10 \times 100$ required recognizing that the product is $1000$.

Key Concept: Shortcomings of Egyptian System

b) It required new symbols for every power of 10.
[Solution Description]
The Egyptian system required a unique symbol for each power of 10. As numbers grew larger, new symbols had to be invented continuously, making the system cumbersome and impractical for very large numbers. For example, representing $10^7$ required a new symbol, and even larger numbers would demand more symbols.

Key Concept: Symbol Representation

a) 5 lotus flowers, 2 coils of rope, 6 heel-bone symbols, and 3 strokes
[Solution Description]

Key Concept: Shortcomings of Egyptian System

c) It uses positional notation to represent values.
[Solution Description]
The Egyptian number system had several limitations, including the need for new symbols for larger numbers, lack of positional value, and absence of a zero symbol. However, it did not have the limitation of requiring complex calculations for addition and subtraction, as these operations were relatively straightforward in the system.

Key Concept: Symbol repetition in Egyptian numerals

a) No, because each symbol can only be repeated up to 9 times before moving to the next higher power of 10.
[Solution Description]
The Egyptian numeral system uses distinct symbols for powers of 10. Each symbol is used up to 9 times before moving to the next higher power of 10. Hence, no symbol can be repeated 10 or more times in a valid representation.

Key Concept: Zero in Number Systems

d) Zero was treated as a number with defined arithmetic properties.
[Solution Description]
The Hindu number system introduced zero as both a placeholder and an independent number. This allowed unambiguous representation and arithmetic operations on zero, revolutionizing mathematics. Aryabhata and Brahmagupta formalized its properties.

Key Concept: Place Value Representation, Zero in Number Systems

b) It allowed unambiguous place value representation and advanced arithmetic
[Solution Description]
The introduction of zero as both a digit and a number was significant because:
1. It allowed unambiguous representation of numbers in a place value system (e.g., distinguishing 205 from 25).
2. It enabled arithmetic operations involving zero (e.g., addition and multiplication properties).
3. It laid the foundation for advanced mathematical concepts like negative numbers and algebra.

Key Concept: Base-60 System Conversion

a) $2 \times 60 + 5$
[Solution Description]
To convert 125 to base-60, divide it by 60:
125 ÷ 60 = 2 with a remainder of 5.
Therefore, 125 = 2 × 60 + 5.
In the Mesopotamian base-60 system, this is represented as two 60s and five 1s.

Key Concept: Place Value Representation

c) 60
[Solution Description]
The Mesopotamian number system is a base-60 system, also known as the sexagesimal system.

Key Concept: Place Value Representation

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the Babylonian number system used base-60 to simplify fraction representation, which is true as 60 has multiple factors (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, 60), allowing for more straightforward division. The Reason provides a correct explanation for why base-60 simplifies fraction representation, as having numerous divisors facilitates easy division into smaller parts. Thus, both the Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Number Representation

b) $(2 \times 60) + 12$
[Solution Description]
To represent 132 in the Mesopotamian system, break it down into multiples of 60: $132 = (2 \times 60) + 12$. Thus, it is represented as two 60s and twelve 1s.

Key Concept: Mesopotamian Number Representation

a) $(2,12)_{60}$
[Solution Description]

The Mesopotamian or Babylonian number system used base 60. This means numbers were grouped according to powers of 60.

To convert 132 into base 60:

132 = 2 × 60 + 12

So, 132 has 2 groups of 60 and 12 units.

Therefore, the Mesopotamian representation is:

$(2,12)_{60}$​​

So, the correct answer is Option A.

Key Concept: Conversion to decimal, multi-step interpretation

b) 24
[Solution Description]
To decode this:
1. Two symbols for 10 represent $2 \times 10 = 20$.
2. Four symbols for 1 represent $4 \times 1 = 4$.
3. Since there is no higher power of 60, this is simply $20 + 4 = 24$.
4. However, if this were in the "60s" place, it would be $(20 + 4) \times 60 = 1440$.
5. The question implies the simplest case (units place only) due to lack of positional context.

Key Concept: Ambiguity in representation, positional interpretation

b) Because the system lacked a clear way to denote empty positions
[Solution Description]
The ambiguity arises because:
1. In the Mesopotamian system, positions represent powers of 60 ($60^0$, $60^1$, $60^2$, etc.).
2. A single wedge $\mathrm{\text{ }}$ (representing 1) in the second position means $1 \times 60^1 = 60$.
3. If spacing is unclear, the same wedge could be interpreted as being in the third position: $1 \times 60^2 = 3600$.
4. The lack of a zero symbol or clear spacing made it impossible to distinguish between positions.

Key Concept: Mesopotamian Place Value System

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that 3600 is represented by a single symbol in the 3600s place in the Mesopotamian system. This is correct because 3600 = 60$^2$, and in their base-60 system, the third position from the right represents multiples of 3600.
The reason explains that the Mesopotamian system was a base-60 positional system. This is also true as the system used powers of 60 for different positions, with the rightmost being 60$^0$ (1s), next 60$^1$ (60s), then 60$^2$ (3600s), etc.
Furthermore, the reason correctly explains why the assertion is true: because it's a base-60 positional system, 3600 corresponds to the third position. Hence, both are true, and the reason is the correct explanation.

Key Concept: Mayan addition

c) 274
[Solution Description]
Convert both numbers to Hindu-Arabic first:
1. First Number:
- Top level ($\overline{\ } \cdot$) = 5 + 1 = 6 units of 20.
- Bottom level ($\cdot \cdot \cdot$) = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 units of 1.
- Total = $(6 \times 20) + 3 = 120 + 3 = 123$.
2. Second Number:
- Top level ($\overline{\ } \cdot \cdot$) = 5 + 1 + 1 = 7 units of 20.
- Bottom level ($\overline{\ } \overline{\ } \cdot$) = 5 + 5 + 1 = 11 units of 1.
- Total = $(7 \times 20) + 11 = 140 + 11 = 151$.
Sum = $123 + 151 = 274$.

Key Concept: Mayan Symbol Interpretation

c) 3 bars and 4 dots
[Solution Description]

In the Mayan numeral system, a dot represents 1 and a bar represents 5. To represent the number 19, we break it as:

19 = 5 + 5 + 5 + 4

So, 19 is represented by 3 bars and 4 dots.

3 bars and 4 dots​

Therefore, the correct answer is Option A.

Key Concept: Conversion from Hindu-Arabic to Mayan

a) Top level: 1 dot; Middle level: 2 dots; Bottom level: 2 dots
[Solution Description]

Key Concept: Conversion from Mayan to Hindu-Arabic

c) 155
[Solution Description]
The Mayan number has two levels:
1. The top level represents 20s, where $\overline{\ } \cdot \cdot$ means $5 + 1 + 1 = 7$ units of 20.
2. The bottom level represents 1s, where $\overline{\ } \overline{\ } \overline{\ }$ means $5 + 5 + 5 = 15$ units of 1.
To convert to Hindu-Arabic, multiply the top level by 20 and add the bottom level:
Total = $(7 \times 20) + 15 = 140 + 15 = 155$.

Key Concept: Mayan Landmark Numbers

d) It aligned with their 360-day calendar system
[Solution Description]
The Mayan civilization used 360 as their third landmark number (after 1 and 20) instead of 400 because it was likely related to their calendar system. Their calendar had 360 days in a year (tun), which influenced their numerical system.

Key Concept: Chinese Number System - Place Value Representation

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the Chinese number system uses blank spaces to indicate skipped place values, which is true as per the syllabus. The Reason explains that this was possible due to the uniformity in symbol sizes, making blank spaces easier to locate compared to the Mesopotamian system. Both statements are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Place Value Representation

a) 7 (Heng), 5 (Zong), blank, 8 (Zong)
[Solution Description]
In the Chinese number system, heng represents tens, thousands, etc., while zong represents units, hundreds, etc. The number 7,508 can be broken down as:
$7 \times 1000 + 5 \times 100 + 0 \times 10 + 8 \times 1$.
Therefore, it would be written as:
7 (Heng for thousands),
5 (Zong for hundreds),
0 (Heng for tens - blank space or zero symbol if available),
8 (Zong for units).

Key Concept: Place Value System Basics

b) blank space
[Solution Description]
The Chinese rod numeral system used a blank space to indicate the skipping of a place value, acting as a placeholder. This is explicitly stated in the syllabus under the description of the system.

Key Concept: Place Value Identification

d) horizontal rod
[Solution Description]
The Chinese rod numeral system uses a horizontal rod to represent the number 5. This is clearly mentioned in the syllabus as: $5 = \text{(horizontal rod)}$.

Key Concept: Chinese Number System - Place Value Representation

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the Chinese rod numeral system used a blank space as a placeholder for zero, which is true according to the syllabus. The reason explains that this method made identifying skipped place values easier compared to the Mesopotamian system, which is also true and correctly explains why the blank space was significant in the Chinese system. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Place Value Representation

a) $4 \times 100 + 2 \times 10 + 6 \times 1$
[Solution Description]
The number 426 can be expanded using place values as follows:
$4$ is in the hundreds place: $4 \times 10^2 = 400$
$2$ is in the tens place: $2 \times 10 = 20$
$6$ is in the units place: $6 \times 1 = 6$
Adding them together: $400 + 20 + 6 = 426$.
So, the correct expanded form is $4 \times 10^2 + 2 \times 10 + 6 \times 1$.

Key Concept: Landmark Numbers

b) Hundreds
[Solution Description]
In the Hindu number system, landmark numbers are powers of 10. Here, $10^2$ represents $10$ multiplied by itself twice, which equals $100$. This is known as the "hundreds" place.

Key Concept: Place Value System

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Hindu number system indeed uses 10 symbols (0-9), making the Assertion true. The Reason is also true because the inclusion of 0 eliminates ambiguity in number representation by acting as a placeholder. Moreover, the Reason correctly explains why 0 is essential in the Hindu number system's place value structure. Thus, both statements are true, and the Reason justifies the Assertion.

Key Concept: Zero as a Digit, Historical Context

b) It allowed unambiguous representation of numbers and enabled arithmetic operations like addition and multiplication with zero.
[Solution Description]
Zero was introduced as a digit in the Hindu number system to serve as both a placeholder and a number. This allowed unambiguous representation of numbers in a place value system and enabled advanced arithmetic operations such as addition, subtraction, and multiplication involving zero. It also laid the foundation for modern mathematics, including algebra and analysis.

Key Concept: Zero in Hindu Number System

c) Codified arithmetic operations with 0
[Solution Description]
Brahmagupta codified the use of 0 as a number with arithmetic properties in his work Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta (628 CE). He introduced operations like addition and multiplication involving zero, treating it as a number on par with others.