Key Concept: Dakshina Digvijaya, Southern Conquests, Coronation
a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
Shivaji's southern conquests (dakṣhiṇa-digvijaya) extended Maratha influence into northern Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. These campaigns provided strategic advantages by creating a buffer zone against Mughal threats. The assertion states that this strategic depth was crucial for countering Mughal invasions, which is true, as it allowed Shivaji to resist Mughal pressures effectively.
The reason mentions that the forts and resources from these territories strengthened Maratha military and economic power. This is also true, as control over key forts like Gingee and Vellore enhanced defensive capabilities and economic stability. Moreover, the reason correctly explains why the assertion is valid—the acquisition of forts and resources directly contributed to the strategic depth that helped counter Mughal invasions.
Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Your Answer is correct.
a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
Shivaji's southern conquests (dakṣhiṇa-digvijaya) extended Maratha influence into northern Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. These campaigns provided strategic advantages by creating a buffer zone against Mughal threats. The assertion states that this strategic depth was crucial for countering Mughal invasions, which is true, as it allowed Shivaji to resist Mughal pressures effectively.
The reason mentions that the forts and resources from these territories strengthened Maratha military and economic power. This is also true, as control over key forts like Gingee and Vellore enhanced defensive capabilities and economic stability. Moreover, the reason correctly explains why the assertion is valid—the acquisition of forts and resources directly contributed to the strategic depth that helped counter Mughal invasions.
Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.