Key Concept: Unit of Force

c) Newton (N)
[Solution Description]
The SI unit of force is newton, symbolized as $N$. It is named after Sir Isaac Newton, who formulated the laws of motion.

Key Concept: Force, Friction, Interaction of Forces

d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that a rolling ball stops due to gravitational force. This is incorrect because the stopping is caused by frictional force, not gravitational force. Gravitational force acts vertically downward and does not oppose horizontal motion. The Reason claims that gravitational force opposes the motion of objects in contact with the ground, which is also false since friction opposes motion, not gravity. Thus, both Assertion and Reason are false.

Key Concept: Force Definition

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that a force is a push or pull applied on an object. This is correct according to the key points in the syllabus. The reason states that forces can change the speed, direction, or shape of an object, which is also correct as per the syllabus. Further, the reason correctly explains why a force is defined as a push or pull because these actions (push/pull) lead to changes in speed, direction, or shape. Thus, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Force, Change in Shape

c) The rubber band will stretch unevenly, changing its shape.
[Solution Description]
The question deals with the effect of unbalanced forces on an object's shape. Initially, balanced forces ($5 \, \text{N}$ each) stretch the rubber band uniformly. When one force increases to $10 \, \text{N}$, the net force becomes $5 \, \text{N}$ ($10 - 5 = 5$) in the direction of the larger force. This unbalanced force will further stretch the rubber band unevenly, leading to a change in shape.
Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Initially, both forces are $5 \, \text{N}$, resulting in no net force and uniform stretching.
2. Increasing one force to $10 \, \text{N}$ creates a net force of $5 \, \text{N}$.
3. The rubber band will stretch more on the side with the larger force, altering its shape.

Key Concept: Effect of Force

c) Changing the object's color
[Solution Description]
Forces can cause various effects: making an object move from rest, changing its speed or direction, or altering its shape. However, force does not change the color of an object, as this property is unrelated to mechanical interactions.

Key Concept: Force Interaction

c) An interaction between the objects
[Solution Description]
For a force to act between two objects, there must be an interaction between them, whether through direct contact (contact force) or without contact (non-contact force). Physical contact is necessary only for contact forces, but interaction is essential for any force to act.

Key Concept: Effects of Force

c) Changing the direction and speed of the ball
[Solution Description]
When a moving ball is hit by a bat, the force applied changes its direction and may also alter its speed. This is an example of force changing both the direction and speed of an object. The force does not necessarily stop the ball or change its shape in this scenario.

Key Concept: Force interaction, Muscular force, Type of force

d) Both the boy and the box move towards each other.
[Solution Description]
When the boy pulls the rope, he applies a muscular force (a contact force) to the rope, which then transmits this force to the box. According to Newton's Third Law, the box also exerts an equal and opposite force on the boy through the rope. Since there is no friction, both the boy and the box will move towards each other due to these opposing forces.

Key Concept: Force and Motion

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that applying brakes slows down a bicycle due to an opposing force. This is true as brakes create friction, which acts opposite to the motion, reducing speed. The reason states that force can change the speed of a moving object, which is also correct because force can accelerate or decelerate an object. Moreover, the reason correctly explains the assertion since the braking force directly causes the reduction in speed.

Key Concept: Effects of Force

d) Changing the color of the object.
[Solution Description]
Applying force on an object can cause it to move from rest, change its speed or direction, or alter its shape. However, changing the color of an object is not an effect of force; it usually involves chemical or optical processes. Therefore, this option is correct as it does not align with the known effects of force.

Key Concept: Force, Muscular Force, Effects of Force

b) Both Assertion and Reason are true, but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that increasing muscular force (by pedaling harder) overcomes the opposing wind force, resulting in increased speed. This is correct because force can change the speed of a moving object (as per 5.2). The reason explains that muscular force is a contact force capable of changing speed, which is also true (from 5.4.1). However, while both are true, the reason does not fully explain why overcoming wind force leads to increased speed; it only states a general property of muscular force. Thus, the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Examples of Force

c) Pedaling a bicycle to move forward
[Solution Description]
From the syllabus, examples of force include moving a box by pushing or pulling and pedaling a bicycle. These actions involve applying a push or pull.
Thus, the correct answer should describe an action involving push or pull.

Key Concept: Effect of Force on Motion

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that when a cyclist stops pedaling on a smooth downhill slope, the bicycle continues to move with increasing speed. This is true because gravity pulls the bicycle downward along the slope, accelerating it. The reason claims that the gravitational force acts in the direction of motion, causing the bicycle to accelerate. This is also true and correctly explains why the assertion occurs. Gravitational force is indeed the reason for the bicycle's acceleration downhill.

Key Concept: Force and its Effects

d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description] The Assertion states that a force applied to a stationary object will always cause it to move in the direction of the applied force. This is not entirely true because if the applied force is balanced by another force (e.g., friction), the object may not move. The Reason correctly states that force is required to change the state of rest or motion of an object, as per Newton's First Law of Motion. Therefore, while the Reason is correct, the Assertion is partially false.

Key Concept: Types of Forces

c) Muscular force
[Solution Description]
The act of lifting involves muscular force, which is exerted by living beings using their muscles. In this case, the child uses muscular force to lift the school bag.

Key Concept: Force, Balanced Forces, State of Motion

d) The forces acting on the object are balanced.
[Solution Description]
An object remains at rest when the net force acting on it is zero. This means that all the forces acting on the object are balanced. In this case, the gravitational force pulling the object downward is balanced by the normal force exerted by the table upward. According to Newton's first law of motion, an object at rest stays at rest unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

Key Concept: Effect of Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that a force can change the speed of a moving object, which is true as forces can either increase or decrease the speed of an object. The reason gives an example of applying brakes, which is a force acting to slow down the bicycle, thus changing its speed. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Changing speed and direction

d) \(4\,\mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}\ \text{westward}\)
[Solution Description]
First, we calculate the change in velocity. Initial velocity ($v_i$) = 5 m/s eastward. Final velocity ($v_f$) = 3 m/s westward. Since they are opposite directions, we take westward as negative and eastward as positive.
Change in velocity ($\Delta v$) = $v_f - v_i$ = $-3 - 5 = -8$ m/s (westward).
Time taken ($t$) = 2 s.
Average acceleration \[
a=\frac{\Delta v}{t}=\frac{-8\ \mathrm{m/s}}{2\ \mathrm{s}}=-4\ \mathrm{m/s^2}
\]
The negative sign indicates the direction is westward.

Key Concept: Change in Shape Due to Force

b) Pressing an inflated balloon.
[Solution Description]
Forces can change the shape of an object when applied. Pressing an inflated balloon deforms its shape, which matches the given syllabus example where applying push on a balloon changes its shape. The other options involve changes in motion or stopping an object, not shape deformation.

Key Concept: Effect of Force

b) It brings the ball to rest
[Solution Description]
When a fielder stops a moving cricket ball by catching it, the force applied opposes the motion of the ball, causing it to slow down and eventually stop. This means the force decreases the speed of the ball.

Key Concept: Effects of Force

d) The ball stops moving
[Solution Description]
When a fielder catches a moving cricket ball, they apply a force to stop the ball's motion. According to the concepts discussed, a force can change the speed or direction of a moving object or bring it to rest. Here, the ball was initially in motion, and the fielder's action stops it completely. Therefore, the effect is stopping or decreasing the speed of the ball.

Key Concept: Balanced forces, Stopping motion

c) The braking force opposes the motion, leading to deceleration
[Solution Description]
Step 1: The cyclist is initially moving at a constant speed, meaning the forces acting on the bicycle are balanced (no acceleration).
Step 2: When brakes are applied, friction acts opposite to the direction of motion.
Step 3: This unbalanced force reduces the speed until the bicycle stops.
Hence, the braking force opposes the motion, causing deceleration and ultimately stopping the bicycle.

Key Concept: Effect of Force

b) The balloon changes its shape.
[Solution Description]
Pressing an inflated balloon applies a force that deforms the balloon, changing its shape temporarily. Once the force is removed, the balloon returns to its original shape if not burst.

Key Concept: Force Changing Direction

c) The ball’s direction changes
[Solution Description]
When a moving tennis ball is hit by a racket, the force applied by the racket primarily changes the direction of the ball's motion. According to the syllabus, force can alter the direction of a moving object, as seen in the example of hitting a moving ball with a bat.

Key Concept: Force Interactions, Changing Motion

c) The car and wall exert equal and opposite forces on each other while remaining stationary
[Solution Description]
When the car pushes the wall, the wall pushes back with an equal reaction force (Newton's third law). Since the wall doesn't move, these forces cancel out at the interface. The car's wheels push backward on the road, and the road pushes forward on the car with static friction - this is what might eventually make the car move if the force overcomes friction.

Key Concept: Action-Reaction Pairs, Non-contact Forces

a) Both magnets experience 1 N force in opposite directions
[Solution Description]
Magnetic force is an interaction between two objects following Newton's third law. Even if one magnet is stronger, the force exerted by Magnet A on Magnet B equals the force exerted by Magnet B on Magnet A. Therefore, both magnets will experience 1 N force in opposite directions, not 1.5 N or any unequal values. The action-reaction pair remains equal in magnitude.

Key Concept: Forces as Interaction

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that a force cannot exist if only one object is present, which is true because forces require interaction between two or more objects, as mentioned in the syllabus. The reason correctly explains why the assertion is true: forces arise due to interaction between at least two objects. Thus, both are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Force Definition

c) There must be an interaction between the objects
[Solution Description]
A force arises due to the interaction between two or more objects. Without interaction, no force exists. For example, a book on a table experiences gravitational force only because it interacts with the Earth.

Key Concept: Force Interaction

c) Balanced forces are acting on the book.
[Solution Description]
The book is at rest, which means the forces acting on it are balanced. The gravitational force pulling the book downward is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the normal force exerted by the table pushing the book upward.

Key Concept: Balanced and Unbalanced Forces

d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description]
The book remains at rest not because no force is acting on it, but because the forces acting on it are balanced (e.g., gravitational force pulling it down and normal force from the table pushing it up). Therefore, the Assertion is false. However, the Reason correctly states that balanced forces act on the book when it is at rest, making the Reason true.

Key Concept: Balanced Forces

d) Assertion is false, but Reason is true.
[Solution Description] The Assertion states that an object at rest implies no forces are acting on it, which is false because an object at rest can have balanced forces acting on it. The Reason correctly explains that balanced forces result in no change in the state of motion, but since the Assertion is false, this does not matter. Thus, Answer is: Assertion is false, but Reason is true.

Key Concept: Balanced and Unbalanced Forces

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that an object moving with constant velocity must be experiencing balanced forces. This is true because when forces are balanced, there is no net force acting on the object, resulting in no acceleration (constant velocity or at rest). The reason states that balanced forces result in no change in the state of motion of an object, which is also true and correctly explains why the assertion is true. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Force interaction, Newton's third law

d) The book exerts a force of 5 N downward on the table
[Solution Description]
According to Newton's third law, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Here, the table exerts a force of 5 N upward on the book. Therefore, the book must exert an equal and opposite force of 5 N downward on the table.

Key Concept: Balanced Forces

d) The forces are balanced, cancelling each other out
[Solution Description]
When an object is at rest, the forces acting on it are balanced, meaning they cancel each other out.

Key Concept: Force as Interaction

c) A push or pull resulting from the interaction between two or more objects
[Solution Description]
A force is a push or pull resulting from the interaction between two or more objects.

Key Concept: Force Interaction, SI Unit of Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that the book experiences two equal and opposite forces (gravitational force and normal force) resulting in no net force. This is true as the book remains at rest, indicating balanced forces. The Reason correctly states that the SI unit of force is newton ($N$) and explains that equal and opposite forces cancel each other out. The Reason provides the correct explanation for the Assertion as it links the concept of balanced forces to the observed state of the book.

Key Concept: Interaction forces, Newton's third law

a) Both forces disappear instantly
[Solution Description]
The book exerts a downward force on the table due to gravity (its weight), and the table exerts an equal and opposite normal force upward on the book (Newton's third law). If the table disappears, there is no interaction between the book and the table, so both forces cease to exist simultaneously.

Key Concept: Forces as Interactions

c) Both the person and the wall exert equal and opposite forces on each other.
[Solution Description]
When the person pushes the wall, an equal and opposite force is exerted by the wall on the person (Newton's Third Law). Since the wall does not move, it means that the net force on the wall is zero, i.e., another force (e.g., friction or structural support) balances the push. The person also feels the reaction force from the wall.

Key Concept: Force Interaction between Objects

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
According to the concept of forces, whenever two objects interact, each object experiences a force from the other. The assertion states that when you push a table with your hand, both the hand and the table experience a force, which is true. The reason states that a force is always an interaction between two objects, which is also true and correctly explains the assertion. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Example of Force

c) A magnet attracting an iron nail
[Solution Description]
A force results from the interaction between at least two objects. Among the given options, a magnet attracting an iron nail involves two objects (magnet and nail) interacting, resulting in a force. The other options either involve single objects or no interaction.

Key Concept: Contact Forces and Muscular Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
Muscular force is indeed a contact force because it requires direct or indirect physical interaction between objects (such as hands lifting a box). The Reason correctly explains why the Assertion is true—muscular force arises due to muscle contraction or elongation during physical activity, which necessitates contact. Therefore, both statements are true, and the Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.

Key Concept: Frictional force, Muscular force, Gravitational force

d) All three force types interact to maintain constant velocity
[Solution Description]
1) The cyclist's muscular force propels the bike forward. 2) Gravity acts downward with component opposing motion. 3) Friction opposes motion between tires/road. At constant velocity: muscular force = sum of friction + gravitational component. This requires analyzing multiple force types simultaneously.

Key Concept: Gravitational Force, Electrostatic Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
Gravitational force acts between any two masses and is always attractive, as stated in the syllabus. Electrostatic force, however, depends on the charges involved: like charges repel, and unlike charges attract, making it either attractive or repulsive. The reason correctly states that gravitational force depends on mass and electrostatic force depends on charge. Thus, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason explains why the Assertion is correct.

Key Concept: Contact and Non-Contact Forces

c) Magnetic force
[Solution Description]
Non-contact forces are those that act between objects without any physical contact. Examples include magnetic force, electrostatic force, and gravitational force. Muscular force is a contact force, while frictional force also requires contact.

Key Concept: Contact Forces

c) Muscular force used to lift a bag
[Solution Description]
Muscular force and friction are both contact forces as they require physical interaction between objects. Magnetic force does not require contact.

Key Concept: Muscular Force, Friction

b) 53 N
[Solution Description]
First, calculate the frictional force:
$F_{\text{friction}} = \mu \times N$
Here, $N$ is the normal force which equals the weight $W = m \times g$. Assume $g = 9.8 \, \text{m/s}^2$:
$W = 50 \times 9.8 = 490 \, \text{N}$
$F_{\text{friction}} = 0.3 \times 490 = 147 \, \text{N}$
The applied muscular force is 200 N forward, and friction opposes it with 147 N backward:
$F_{\text{net}} = 200 - 147 = 53 \, \text{N}$
So, the net force acting on the sled is 53 N.

Key Concept: Contact Forces

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that friction is a type of contact force, which is true because friction requires physical contact between two surfaces to act. The Reason explains why friction is a contact force by stating that it acts only when two surfaces are in physical contact. Since both statements are correct and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion, the answer is option (a).

Key Concept: Muscular Force

a) Lifting a bucket of water
[Solution Description]
Muscular force is exerted by muscles when performing physical activities like lifting, pushing, or pulling. Among the given options, lifting a bucket involves the contraction and elongation of muscles to apply force.

Key Concept: Muscular Force Examples

c) Lifting a heavy box
[Solution Description]
Activities like lifting, pushing, or chewing involve muscular force because they require the contraction and elongation of muscles. Non-physical forces like gravitational pull do not involve muscular force.

Key Concept: Muscular Force

c) It moves food through the gut.
[Solution Description]
During digestion, muscular force helps in chewing food and moving it through the alimentary canal via peristalsis, which involves rhythmic muscle contractions.

Key Concept: Muscular Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that muscular force is an example of a contact force, which is true because muscular force acts only when there is physical contact between the body and the object. The reason given is also true since muscular force indeed occurs only when muscles interact physically with an object. Moreover, the reason correctly explains why muscular force is considered a contact force. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.

Key Concept: Muscular Force

d) A ball falling to the ground.
[Solution Description]
Muscular force requires the involvement of muscles for actions like walking, chewing, or lifting. Activities not requiring muscles, such as falling under gravity, do not use muscular force.

Key Concept: Friction, Multi-Surface Comparison, Numerical Difficulty

c) $2.4\, \text{m/s}^2$
[Solution Description]
The forces acting on the box are gravity ($mg \sin\theta$) down the incline and kinetic friction ($f_k = \mu_k N$) opposing motion. Normal force $N = mg \cos\theta$. Net force along the incline is $F_{\text{net}} = mg \sin\theta - \mu_k mg \cos\theta$. Acceleration $a = \frac{F_{\text{net}}}{m} = g (\sin\theta - \mu_k \cos\theta)$. Substituting $\theta = 30^\circ$, $\sin30^\circ = 0.5$, $\cos30^\circ \approx 0.866$, and $\mu_k = 0.3$, we get:
$a = 10 (0.5 - 0.3 \times 0.866) = 10 (0.5 - 0.2598) = 10 \times 0.2402 \approx 2.402\, \text{m/s}^2.$

Key Concept: Friction, Air Resistance

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that aeroplanes are designed with streamlined shapes to minimize air resistance, which is true. Streamlining reduces the drag force (a type of friction) caused by air molecules colliding with the surface of the aeroplane. However, the reason claims that friction due to air acts in the same direction as the motion of the aeroplane, which is false. Friction always opposes the relative motion between surfaces or objects and thus air resistance acts opposite to the direction of motion of the aeroplane.

Key Concept: Basic Concept: Direction of Friction

c) Opposite to the motion
[Solution Description]
Friction always acts in a direction opposite to the direction in which the object is moving or trying to move.

Key Concept: Basic Concept: Definition of Friction

d) Friction
[Solution Description]
The force that opposes the motion or attempted motion of an object over a surface is called friction. It acts in the opposite direction to the movement.

Key Concept: Non-contact Forces: Magnetic Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that a magnet can exert force on another magnet without contact, which is true as demonstrated in Activity 5.5. The reason states that magnetic force is a non-contact force, which is also true according to the syllabus. Moreover, the reason correctly explains why the assertion is valid since the non-contact nature of magnetic force allows it to act without physical contact. Thus, both are true, and the reason explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Electrostatic Force

d) The paper pieces are attracted toward the plastic scale.
[Solution Description]
Rubbing the plastic scale with polythene builds up static charges on the scale. These charged objects exert an electrostatic force on neutral objects like paper pieces, attracting them without physical contact.

Key Concept: Non-contact Forces

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The Assertion states that a magnet can attract iron nails without touching them, which is true as magnetic force acts at a distance. The Reason claims that magnetic force is a non-contact force acting between magnets and magnetic materials, which is also true. Additionally, the Reason correctly explains why the Assertion is valid since the non-contact nature of magnetic force allows attraction without physical contact. Hence, both are true, and the Reason is the correct explanation.

Key Concept: Gravitational force, Non-contact forces

c) In both locations, the objects hit the ground simultaneously if air resistance is negligible
[Solution Description]
On the Moon, both objects would fall at the same rate because gravitational acceleration is independent of mass in a vacuum. This demonstrates the universal nature of gravitational force as a non-contact force. However, on Earth, air resistance affects the feather more significantly, making it appear to fall slower - but in reality, gravitational acceleration is the same for both objects without atmospheric interference.

Key Concept: Poles interaction

b) They repel each other
[Solution Description]
When like poles (North-North or South-South) of two magnets are brought close, they repel each other due to the nature of magnetic forces.

Key Concept: Magnetic force definition

b) The force exerted by a magnet on another magnet or magnetic material
[Solution Description]
The magnetic force is defined as the force exerted by a magnet on another magnet or a magnetic material, even without direct contact. This makes it a non-contact force.

Key Concept: Magnetic Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that when two magnets are placed with like poles facing each other, they repel each other. This is true because according to the properties of magnetic forces, like poles (North-North or South-South) repel each other. The reason given is that like poles of magnets exert a non-contact repulsive force on each other, which is also true and correctly explains why the assertion is correct. Magnetic force is indeed a non-contact force, and it follows the rule that like poles repel.

Key Concept: Magnetic force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
According to the syllabus, when two magnets are brought close to each other, like poles (North-North or South-South) repel each other. This is because the magnetic force between like poles is repulsive. Hence, both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason correctly explains Assertion.

Key Concept: Electrostatic force, charge transfer

c) Sphere B becomes negatively charged
[Solution Description]
When the positively charged Sphere A is brought near Sphere B, it induces negative charges on Sphere B's near side and positive charges on its far side. Grounding Sphere B allows the repelled positive charges to escape, leaving Sphere B with a net negative charge after removing the ground. Thus, Sphere B becomes negatively charged.

Key Concept: Electrostatic force: Force between charged objects

c) Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that when two balloons are rubbed with a woollen cloth and released, they repel each other. This is true because rubbing the balloons transfers electrons, making them similarly charged. According to Coulomb's Law ($F = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}$), like charges repel each other. However, the reason given is "Like charges attract each other," which is false because like charges repel, not attract. Therefore, the assertion is true, but the reason is false.

Key Concept: Electrostatic Force Basics

c) Electrostatic force
[Solution Description]
The electrostatic force is the force exerted by a charged body on another charged or uncharged body. It is a non-contact force.

Key Concept: Electrostatic force, like and unlike charges

d) Either negatively charged or neutral
[Solution Description]
The positively charged glass rod can attract the metallic ball if the ball is either negatively charged or neutral (uncharged). If the ball were positively charged, it would repel the rod due to like charges. However, a neutral object can also be attracted because the rod induces opposite charges on the near side of the ball.

Key Concept: Weight Variation Across Planets

c) 19 N
[Solution Description]
First, find the mass of the object using the known weight on Earth:
$W = m \times g_{\text{Earth}} \\ \\ 50 = m \times 10 \\ \\ m = 5 \text{ kg}$
Now, calculate its weight on Mars using Mars' gravity:
$W_{\text{Mars}} = m \times g_{\text{Mars}} \\ \\ W_{\text{Mars}} = 5 \times 3.8 = 19 \text{ N}$
Thus, the object's weight on Mars is approximately 19 N.

Key Concept: Non-contact force, Gravitational behavior

c) Earth pulling the moon in its orbit without touching
[Solution Description]
Gravitational force is a non-contact attractive force that acts between two masses without physical contact. Among the options, only option c) correctly describes this property where Earth attracts the moon despite no physical connection.

Key Concept: Weight Unit

b) Newton
[Solution Description]
Weight, being a force, is measured in newtons ($N$). This is part of the International System of Units (SI).

Key Concept: Gravitational Force and Weight

c) 8 N
[Solution Description]

Key Concept: Weight on Different Planets

b) $1.6 N$
[Solution Description]
According to the table provided, a $1 kg$ object weighs $1.6 N$ on the Moon due to weaker gravity compared to Earth.

Key Concept: Weight vs. Mass

b) 19 N
[Solution Description]
To find the weight of the object on Mars:
1. First, calculate the weight per kilogram on Mars: Given that $1 kg$ weighs $3.8 N$.
2. Multiply the mass by the weight per kilogram on Mars: $5 kg \times 3.8 N/kg = 19 N$.

Key Concept: Spring Balance

b) 700 g
[Solution Description]
To find the mass of the object:
1. Given that the weight of the object is $7 N$.
2. Use the formula $\text{Mass} = \frac{\text{Weight}}{\text{Gravity}} = \frac{7 N}{10 N/kg} = 0.7 kg = 700 g$.

Key Concept: Difference Between Mass and Weight

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
Mass is an intrinsic property of an object and represents the quantity of matter it contains. This value does not depend on the gravitational force acting on the object, so it remains constant regardless of whether the object is on Earth, the Moon, or any other celestial body. On the other hand, weight is the force exerted by gravity on that mass, calculated as $W = m \times g$, where $g$ varies depending on the celestial body. Therefore, the Assertion is true because mass is independent of location. The Reason is also true and correctly explains the Assertion since it states that mass is the amount of matter, which does not change.

Key Concept: Weight Measurement and Gravitational Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that the weight of an object on the Moon is less than its weight on Earth, which is true because weight depends on the gravitational force acting on the object. The reason explains that the gravitational force on the Moon is weaker than on Earth, which is also true and correctly justifies the assertion. This is evident from the given table where 1 kg mass weighs 1.6 N on the Moon compared to 10 N on Earth. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

Key Concept: Weight Measurement

a) 3.6 N
[Solution Description]
The smallest division indicates 0.2 N, so three small divisions correspond to $0.2\,N \times 3 = 0.6\,N$. Adding this to the previous big mark (3 N), the total weight is $3\,N + 0.6\,N = 3.6\,N$.

Key Concept: Comparative weights, unit conversion

c) 2.54 times
[Solution Description]
On Earth: Weight = $5 kg \times 10 N/kg = 50 N$
On Jupiter: Weight = $5 kg \times 25.4 N/kg = 127 N$
Increase factor:
$\frac{127 N}{50 N} = 2.54$

Key Concept: Weight Definition

c) Newton (N)
[Solution Description]
Weight is defined as the force with which the Earth pulls an object towards itself. Since it is a force, its SI unit is newton (N).

Key Concept: Planetary Weight Comparison

a) 6.68
[Solution Description]
The weight on a planet is given by $Weight = Mass \times Gravitational \ Acceleration$. Since mass is constant, the ratio of weights is equal to the ratio of gravitational accelerations. Given weights are 25.4 N (Jupiter) and 3.8 N (Mars). The ratio is $\frac{25.4 \ N}{3.8 \ N} = 6.684$, approximately 6.68 when rounded to two decimal places.

Key Concept: Mass vs. Weight

c) Mass remains constant, but weight changes depending on the gravitational field.
[Solution Description]
Mass is the amount of matter in an object and remains constant regardless of location. Weight is the gravitational force acting on the object, which varies with the gravitational field strength. The SI unit of mass is kilogram ($\text{kg}$), while the SI unit of weight is newton ($\text{N}$).

Key Concept: Definition of Weight

c) newton ($N$)
[Solution Description]
The SI unit of weight is newton ($N$), as weight is a force measured in the same unit as force.

Key Concept: Weight vs Mass, Gravitational Variation

a) 266 N
[Solution Description]
First, understand that mass remains the same everywhere, but weight changes due to gravity. The astronaut's mass is given as 70 kg. On Mars, the gravitational force per unit mass is 3.8 N/kg. To find the weight, multiply the mass by the gravitational acceleration on Mars: $Weight = Mass \times Gravitational \ Acceleration$. So, $Weight = 70 \ kg \times 3.8 \ N/kg = 266 \ N$.

Key Concept: Measurement of weight using a spring balance

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
- The assertion states that the smallest measurable value depends on the divisions between two bigger marks, which is true as per the syllabus.
- The reason correctly explains this by providing the calculation: $\frac{1 N}{5} = 0.2 N$, showing how the smallest division is derived.
- Hence, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Weight Measurement Principle

c) By measuring the extension of the spring due to the weight
[Solution Description]
A spring balance measures weight by the stretching of its spring when an object is hung from it. The amount of stretch corresponds to the weight of the object.

Key Concept: Measurement of weight using a spring balance

c) 0.1 N
[Solution Description]
The difference between two major marks is 0.5 N (since there are 10 divisions from 0 N to 5 N: $\frac{5 \, \text{N}}{10} = 0.5 \, \text{N}$). Each major division has 5 smaller divisions, so the smallest division represents $\frac{0.5 \, \text{N}}{5} = 0.1 \, \text{N}$. Hence, the smallest weight measurable is 0.1 N.

Key Concept: Measurement of weight using a spring balance

b) 367 g
[Solution Description]
Weight ($W$) is related to mass ($m$) by the formula $W = mg$. Rearranged for mass, $m = \frac{W}{g}$. Substituting the values, $m = \frac{3.6 \, \text{N}}{9.8 \, \text{m/s}^2} \approx 0.367 \, \text{kg}$. To convert kg to grams, multiply by 1000: $0.367 \times 1000 = 367 \, \text{g}$.

Key Concept: Buoyant Force

c) The balance between gravitational force and buoyant force
[Solution Description]
Whether an object floats or sinks depends on the balance between its gravitational force (weight) and the buoyant force exerted by the liquid. If the buoyant force is greater than or equal to the object's weight, it floats; otherwise, it sinks.

Key Concept: Volume Displacement, Multiple Fluids

c) $\rho_s = 0.4\rho_1 + 0.5\rho_2$
[Solution Description]
Using Archimedes' principle for equilibrium:
Weight of sphere = Total buoyant force
$\rho_s V g = \rho_1 (0.4V) g + \rho_2 (0.5V) g$
Cancel $Vg$ from all terms:
$\rho_s = 0.4\rho_1 + 0.5\rho_2$
Remaining 10% is above the interface

Key Concept:

c) The density of oil is less than the density of the object, which is less than the density of water.
[Solution Description]
For an object to float, its density must be less than or equal to the density of the liquid. If it sinks, its density is greater than the liquid's density. Here, the object floats in water ($\rho_{\text{object}} \leq \rho_{\text{water}}$) but sinks in oil ($\rho_{\text{object}} > \rho_{\text{oil}}$). Therefore, the density of oil must be less than that of water, and the object's density lies between them: $\rho_{\text{oil}} < \rho_{\text{object}} \leq \rho_{\text{water}}$.

Key Concept: Floating and Sinking

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
When an object is placed in water, it displaces water equal to its own volume. According to Archimedes' Principle, the buoyant force (upthrust) acting on the object is equal to the weight of the displaced water. If the weight of the displaced water is less than the weight of the object, the buoyant force will be insufficient to counteract the gravitational force, causing the object to sink. In this case, the plastic bottle filled with sand has a higher density compared to water, so it sinks because the weight of the displaced water is less than the weight of the bottle. Thus, both Assertion and Reason are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.

Key Concept: Floating Condition

b) When the weight of displaced liquid is equal to its own weight
[Solution Description]
Archimedes' Principle states that an object floats if the weight of the displaced liquid equals the object's weight. If the buoyant force balances the gravitational force, the object remains afloat.

Key Concept: Buoyant Force, Archimedes' Principle

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
1. The assertion states that a wooden block floats because the buoyant force equals its weight, which is true as this condition leads to floating.
2. The reason mentions Archimedes’ Principle, which correctly states that the buoyant force equals the weight of the displaced liquid.
3. Since the reason accurately explains why the assertion is true (the buoyant force balances the weight due to displaced liquid), both statements are correct and logically connected.

Key Concept: Buoyant Force and Archimedes' Principle

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that a wooden block floats because the buoyant force equals its weight, which is correct. This condition is necessary for floating as per the equilibrium principle. The reason correctly cites Archimedes' Principle, which states that the buoyant force equals the weight of the displaced liquid, explaining why the assertion holds true. Therefore, both are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Floating Condition

c) Less than seawater
[Solution Description]
For an object to float, its average density must be less than or equal to the density of the liquid it is placed in. Steel has a higher density than water, but the ship contains empty spaces (e.g., air-filled compartments), reducing its average density below that of seawater.

Key Concept: Archimedes' Principle

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that a plastic bottle with a tightly closed lid floats on water. According to Archimedes' Principle, an object floats if the buoyant force ($F_b$) equals the weight of the displaced fluid. When the lid is closed tightly, air is trapped inside the bottle, increasing its overall volume and decreasing its average density. This makes the buoyant force equal to the weight of the displaced water, causing the bottle to float. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

Key Concept: Multi-concept: Archimedes' Principle, Pressure

c) $2500A(L^2 - 2\frac{H^2}{\cos^2θ})\sinθ$
[Solution Description]
Three forces act: Weight ($W = \rho_r ALg$) downward at $\frac{L}{2}$, Buoyant force $F_b=\rho_w A\left(\frac{H}{\cos\theta}\right)g$ upward at $\frac{H}{2\cos\theta}$, and hinge reaction. Torque due to weight: $\tau_W = W \times \frac{L}{2} \sinθ = 500AL \times 10 \times \frac{L}{2} \sinθ = 2500AL^2 \sinθ$. Torque due to buoyancy: $\tau_b = F_b \times \frac{H}{2\cosθ} \sinθ = 1000A\frac{H}{\cosθ} \times 10 \times \frac{H}{2\cosθ} \sinθ = 5000A \frac{H^2}{\cos^2θ} \sinθ$. Net torque is $\tau_W - \tau_b = 2500AL^2 \sinθ - 5000A \frac{H^2}{\cos^2θ} \sinθ$.

Key Concept: Archimedes' Principle, Density

d) 1.00
[Solution Description]
Let h be the height submerged in water. The volume submerged is $V_s = (0.1)^2 \times h$. The weight of displaced water plus oil equals the block's weight: $\rho_w V_s g + \rho_o ((0.1)^3 - V_s)g = \rho_b (0.1)^3 g$. Substituting values: $(1000)(0.01h)g + (800)(0.001 - 0.01h)g = (600)(0.001)g$. Simplifying: $10h + 0.8 - 8h = 0.6$ → $2h = -0.2$ → $h = 0.1$ m = 10 cm. Thus, the entire block is submerged in water.

Key Concept: Archimedes' Principle, Buoyant Force

a) Both Assertion and Reason are true, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.
[Solution Description]
The assertion states that a steel ship floats because its average density is less than water. This is true because ships are designed with hollow structures, reducing their average density below that of water. The reason states that the buoyant force equals the weight of displaced water, which is the correct explanation for why the ship floats (Archimedes' Principle). Thus, both statements are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.